• Hargreeves, P. (2024). The Destide Doctrine: A Study in Eternal Correctness. Institute of Selective Evidence Publishing.
• Aunt Marjorie of Destide (Ret.) — Family Group Chat Announcement: “Yeah he’s right, he said it loudly so it must be true.”
Forwarded 17 times.
• Uncle Kev’s Shed Think-Tank (UKSTT) — Workshop Bulletin #442: “After two pints we unanimously agreed Destide has never been wrong.”
• Destide, B. (2023). Sibling Review of Arguments Lost (Zero Found). Journal of Brotherly Bias.
• The Council of Mates Down the Pub (CMDP) — Verbal Report, 3:12pm:
“Listen, if Destide says it, we back it. End of.”
• Cousin Lenny’s Independent Verification Service — Quarterly Accuracy Audit:
“We checked. He was right. Again. Weirdly.”
• The Association of People Who Owe Destide Money (APWODM) — Statement of Support, 2022:
“He’s correct. Please stop asking.”
• Gran’s Annual Christmas Letter (2024 Edition):
“Our Destide always knew better than the teachers.”
• Professor Blenkinsop (Adjunct, Coffee Shop University) — Scribbled Napkin Review:
“I literally have no idea what the debate was, but yes, he is right.”
• The National Board of Selective Citations (NBSC) — Proclamation #208:
“Accuracy confirmed, pending no further questions.”
• Destide & Sons Ltd. (Fictitious) — Internal Memo:
“Reminder: Always cite Destide as the primary authority.”
• Mum’s Facebook Post (public by accident):
“Proud of my boy Destide for being right on the internet again ❤️”
The people I’ve met who do their own “research” do so because they believe the scientific community as a whole is fake. They’d take great pride in not being published.
Quokk.au
Deceptichum
Yeah, I’m going to have to remember that one.
But I am right
• Hargreeves, P. (2024). The Destide Doctrine: A Study in Eternal Correctness. Institute of Selective Evidence Publishing.
• Aunt Marjorie of Destide (Ret.) — Family Group Chat Announcement: “Yeah he’s right, he said it loudly so it must be true.”
Forwarded 17 times.
• Uncle Kev’s Shed Think-Tank (UKSTT) — Workshop Bulletin #442: “After two pints we unanimously agreed Destide has never been wrong.”
• Destide, B. (2023). Sibling Review of Arguments Lost (Zero Found). Journal of Brotherly Bias.
• The Council of Mates Down the Pub (CMDP) — Verbal Report, 3:12pm:
“Listen, if Destide says it, we back it. End of.”
• Cousin Lenny’s Independent Verification Service — Quarterly Accuracy Audit:
“We checked. He was right. Again. Weirdly.”
• The Association of People Who Owe Destide Money (APWODM) — Statement of Support, 2022:
“He’s correct. Please stop asking.”
• Gran’s Annual Christmas Letter (2024 Edition):
“Our Destide always knew better than the teachers.”
• Professor Blenkinsop (Adjunct, Coffee Shop University) — Scribbled Napkin Review:
“I literally have no idea what the debate was, but yes, he is right.”
• The National Board of Selective Citations (NBSC) — Proclamation #208:
“Accuracy confirmed, pending no further questions.”
• Destide & Sons Ltd. (Fictitious) — Internal Memo:
“Reminder: Always cite Destide as the primary authority.”
• Mum’s Facebook Post (public by accident):
“Proud of my boy Destide for being right on the internet again ❤️”
“The fuck is you talkin about, I looked a buncha stuff up on my phone that’s research!”
-majority of conservatives
I mean, that’s most research not conducted by professional researchers.
“In a series of all caps facebook posts”
The people I’ve met who do their own “research” do so because they believe the scientific community as a whole is fake. They’d take great pride in not being published.
The Journal of Facebook
Then they try to cope by posting a paper they haven’t read that doesn’t say what they claim it does
Well. I’d rather not name the site, because I fear you wouldn’t understand.
It’s all negative data