• jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Reminder that poor Gary Bowser was jailed for a year and owes 30% of his income to Nintendo for the rest of his life. He uses a wheelchair and has two kids.

    It would be morally wrong to pirate all future Nintendo titles and pay the cover price to Gary’s gofundme. Please don’t do that.

    • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s no way that kind of punishment is allowed by the 8th amendment. This is definitely an unusual punishment.

      • TrudeauCastroson [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I thought he was selling chips that let you do piracy

        Either way, he and his descendants should be indentured servants to Nintendo. His lineage must be shamed.

      • kot [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Reminder that “poor Gary” was selling pirated roms.

        Oh, the horror! I guess that justifies ruining his life forever.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I disagree with selling pirated roms but, he also wasn’t part of the development team he was closer to a sales associate then anything. the punishment given to him was cruel and unusable and honestly a failure of the legal system.

        I see this on the same level as forcing a sales associate at Walmart to pay the fine of all the wage violations the company as a whole did. It’s rediculous.

        I personally will never be buying a Nintendo product again out of principle.

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Please don’t conflate an open effort to own your own hardware and data with a closed effort to literally sell access to copyrighted content under the table, and try to launder the profits and commit fraud. Yuzu and Bowser are not the same.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        you mean the MiGSwitch, a device for dumping and preserving switch ROMs? I would love to have one for personal backups, and it pairs well with yuzu. Team Xecuter is credibly presumed to be the developers, so that’s likely Bowser’s current hobby.

          • Encamped@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Also believe his (proprietary) software would brick switches if it detected other software, though don’t quote me on that.

          • macniel@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Do you really believe that the last statement by yuzu is their own opinion? It really reads as it was written by a Nintendo lawyer and they just needed to sign it.

            • Perfide@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yuzu has always expressed that opinion about piracy publicly. Whether they actually believe that is another matter, but it’s nothing new for them to say that.

              • kenopsik@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Basically every emulator developer will say that their platform is not for piracy but for backing up your legally purchased games, but it’s usually just a “wink wink nudge nudge” type of thing for legal reasons.

                • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  This is what Nintendo wants people to think. They want you to think hacking your own hardware is synonymous with copyright infringement. And it’s categorically not. Just like collecting knives isn’t synonymous with committing murder.

                  I agree that Yuzu was toeing a fine line when they should have instead steered far clear of it and only supported playback of homebrew apps without encryption, but that’s not to say they did anything ethically wrong. Backing up your own files shouldn’t be a right we lose just because of criminals walking around “wink wink, nudge nudging” each other. Punish the murderers, not the knife sellers.

  • kaputter Aimbot@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    – A wild Codeberg appeared. –

    Codeberg is a collaboration platform providing Git hosting and services for free and open source software, content and projects.

    Website: Codeberg.org


    The organization selected the European Union for their headquarters and computer infrastructure, due to members’ concerns that a software project repository hosted in the United States could be removed if a malicious actor made bad faith copyright claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

    Wikipedia: Codeberg e.V.


    In June 2022 the Software Freedom Conservancy’s “Give Up Github” campaign (in response to the GitHub Copilot licensing controversy) promoted Codeberg as an alternative to GitHub.

    Conservancy: Give Up GitHub!

  • velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Nintendo screwed big time. Now there’s going to be multiple forks of Yuzu all over the internet. And on every self-hosted Git forge.

    • Bilb!@lem.monster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The bigger deal is that development by this team has been halted, not that it will be a little harder to find a trustworthy download of the most recent version.

      • Fisch@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s only temporary tho. One fork will emerge as the replacement everyone goes to, including the developers who were only working on Yuzu and Citra as volunteers. We know what Nintendo was sueing over, so that can probably be avoided in that fork.

      • nailoC5@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yep. This is more to stop the emulation of their next console than anything else. Especially considering it’s likely to be a just slightly better Switch.

        • sleepyTonia@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Honestly, I’ll think more than twice before buying that thing if it really just is a Switch refresh. Not even taking into account the fact that whether it’s Yuzu or not, it’ll probably be supported by a Switch emulator in a comically short time after coming out. I’m still waiting for some insider leaks ten years from now revealing the Switch was indeed just some rebranded gaming tablet. Too many half-assed features, both on the firmware/OS side of things, but also the controller connectivity and drifting. It’s their worst console up to now. But damn, are their games fun.

  • Lojcs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    They’re shutting down the website too :( I really liked the in depth update logs. Yuzu (the website, emulator, android app) felt so extraordinarily polished for an emulator too. Shame Nintendo

  • macniel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    fuck Nintendo, I’ll never support them or buy anything related to them ever again.

          • Fisch@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Because people think that Nintendo deserves that money and pirating is unfair and wrong. In a vacuum, they do make good games that are worth the money but with all the shit they’re pulling, they’re basically abusing the law and their power as a huge company to force people to do what they want. That’s why, in my eyes, it’s only fair to pirate their stuff. If they’re gonna play unfair, so am I. There’s a huge chunk of people who aren’t that well informed on what Nintendo’s doing and why it’s wrong, who don’t want to do something illegal or who just want the convenience tho.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I feel like the people saying this now aren’t going to follow through and will buy future Nintendo products. If this behavior was a deal breaker for you then you would already be boycotting Nintendo.

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Where does a FOSS project find $2.4M? They weren’t selling anything were they? They can’t really have that big of a war chest can they?

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      My understanding is they’ve been making 30k a month from their Patreon.

      Which is also the main reason they were vulnerable to a lawsuit, because they’ve been profiting off of the emulator (which why legal by itself, is only popular enough to make money due to piracy).

        • willya@lemmyf.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Is this your first time venturing on to Patreon? The YouTube channel cold ones makes $84k a month from Patreon and they just get drunk, smash shit, and play video games.

        • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          The most recent version of Yuzu (which theoretically has the best performance) is semi-locked behind their Patreon.

          This was especially important when TotK came out, because they were making a bunch of tweaks to improve performance for that game. So people who wanted to play TotK needed to subscribe to get the best results (or build from source, I’m assuming).

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        $2.4M is 8 years’ worth in that case, assuming they were making that much the entire time. And of course a lot of that money was probably for the devs to afford basic living expenses.

        • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          6 years and 8 months, but yeah I can’t see them having the money, even if they saved everything.

    • T (they/she)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Can’t they just file for bankruptcy or something like that and not really pay the money? I think it isn’t about the cash, but just shutting the project down

    • Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      They don’t have it. It’s a limited liability company so in this way they will pay only the sum of their assets (=bankruptcy) which is lower than legal expenses against a Goliath and definitely lower than 2.4 million. I’m guessing 1000x lower than the settled amount or they wouldn’t have reason to found the LLC in first place or to settle this easy and this fast

  • mudle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    As of right now, both Citra and Yuzu are available via Flathub!!! Get them now if you don’t have it!!!

  • NOPper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m planning to just Google my way out of this, but what’s the cleanest way to block the repo I’ve been using in yay from updates without uninstalling the version I’ve got running already?

    • guywithoutaname@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Are you using the AUR? The package will probably just get orphaned or the upstream will change to a duplicate repo. I don’t see Yuzu or Citra going anywhere considering they are open source.

      • NOPper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah pretty sure I installed the experimental branch from the AUR. I just didn’t want the repo to be poisoned or something. 🤷‍♂️

        Thanks for the info!