• DoctorNope@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Trump appointee Aileen Cannon indefinitely postpones Trump classified documents trial, but I hardly see why that’s relevant.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And a particularly unqualified and ideological appointment, even by Trump standards.

      • Delusional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Idk trump standards are “do the opposite of what is good and right” so this seems right up the trump standards alley.

  • null@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Make sure you don’t vote for Biden though, because of that one issue you suddenly care about.

    Inb4 the standard myopic replies from .ml accounts

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      that one issue you suddenly care about.

      That will also be significantly worse under Trump.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    After decades of Americans saving the world in movies I can now confidently say that they instead will just sit at home continuing their consumption until someone comes and shoots them like a dog. We jUsT NeeD tO VoTe HArdEr

      • Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        jUsT vOtE

        For what? No change? The status quo? I’d rather vote for America’s downfall so that the pain and terror Americans inflict overseas, is felt here in our borders.

        Americans love violence so much, why should you have peace in your streets?

  • rusticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Fire her. She’s compromised and a Trump appointee that should have been recused.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      How?

      Wouldn’t she need to be to be impeached by the House? The house is controlled by the GOP. Even if a few republicans wanted to remove her, you would still need the GOP speaker to bring this to the floor.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The prosecutor can request that she be removed from the case, but that’s extreme and, if fails, leaves him with a hostile judge that is also even more empowered than before.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Listen, I’ve seen this in every thread. The judges are just being extra careful so they can make sure the case doesn’t get thrown out because it’s a highly sensitive subject.

      Four years just wasn’t enough time. You have to be patient about these things. Give us another Friedman Unit or two to settle things out.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          They’re trying to conflate a right-wing judge’s bias with those biG bAd LibErAlS who defend Garland’s meticulous albeit slow investigation and hand-off to Jack Smith I guess.

    • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re assuming Trump will win the election. He won’t.

      Jesus, why do people forget that Trump lost an election while being president and while trying to tamper with it? What makes you think he will win this time?