Take Up Cycling as a Hobby. It Might Literally Save Your Brain.

submitted by

www.vice.com/en/article/take-up-cycling-as-a-ho…

117

Log in to comment

17 Comments

All that cheery pro cycling stuff having been said, cyclists with the APOE4 gene did not see the same benefit. APOE4 is a known risk factor for Alzheimer’s. Researchers also acknowledged that while the study adjusted for age and education, its findings are purely observational. It’s not establishing a 100 percent definitive pattern of cause-and-effect.

Also important, is most people suffering from dementia don't recognize what's happening.

However, they'll still respond to symptoms by starting to avoid activities that give them difficulty. Even if they're not consciously understanding why they're not enjoying a hobby anymore.

So I wouldn't be surprised if further studies show that as a cyclist starts to develop dementia, the loss of ability in navigating their surroundings causes them to stop riding as much. If that's true, then that accounts for why cyclists would have lower rates of dementia...

Because the ones developing dementia, stop being cyclists.

Quick edit:

What would be really interesting is looking at rates for elderly cyclists who have switched to a stationary bike, and if symptoms were starting to manifest before or after the switch.

But you don't know if you have the APOE4 gene or not

It's done wonders for my legs. My brain, on the other hand...

Interesting research but very early stages. There's a good chance that this isn't really specific to bikes, but more generally applies to the benefits of people enjoying hobbies and a good quality of life translating into a better psychological state, which is known to affect health outcomes in a myriad of ways specially related to brain function and hormones.

Interestingly, the data also shows that mixed-walking is associated with reduced dementia as well... and I find it a bit confusing that the authors are lumping driving and public transit together in the nonactive category because public transit usually involves a good deal of walking too without people categorizing it as a walking mode of transport.

Beyond separating public transit from driving, I think major factors to control for are: 1) how often these non-commute activities happen; and 2) what's the stress level of that transportation mode. With those three things in mind I think it would clarify why would walking be associated with worst outcomes than nonactive...

Wait, this is a recent article? I (and Wikipedia) thought Vice has stopped publishing articles? (I aslo dimly remember them being bought by someone terrible but looks like I'm confusing that with something else)

I loved bicycling as a kid. I don't think I can find an under 100 dollar bike these days though.

Craigslist or Marketplace. Get a 90s mountain bike in your size. Start riding. Join a cycling club/social group. People are always changing bikes, and would be happy to let an older one go for a decent price.

It CAN be an expensive hobby, but it doesn’t have to be. I’ve been riding my $200 Craigslist special for about 1200km this year and I haven’t spent a penny on it.

Bike co-ops exist too! Check your area

Seconding bike co-ops, especially for people who don't know much or are intimidated by bike maintenance. The people who work at these places are always super eager to help you get on a good bicycle for cheap!

Used bikes on Craigslist, get a chromoly 3x7 from a reputable brand. They are super cheap, reliable, and versatile. My main commuter is just an old Trek 820 MTB with some minor upgrades I've made over the years.

Find a used single speed, they need minimal maintenance and have fewer moving parts.

Nobody who reads Vice has this problem.

Strange story.

as a hobby

So drive for fun rather than just as a mode of transport?

Just remember to wear your helmet.

No, thanks.

Also, people cycle a lot in the Netherlands and it has one of the world's highest rates of dementia 🤷‍♂️

what's wrong with wearing a helmet?

I've always wondered why people driving a car do not wear a helmet. Or just walking around in the city. There is no question that it would save lives!

They did not say there was something wrong with wearing a helmet.

Vice is not a legitimate source of information unless they are getting high as fuck and documenting it. They are pretty good at that.

Why is Vice still a publication?

Comments from other communities

Honestly I don't even enjoy cycling much (so it's not my hobby), but it's so much better than suffocating in a hot overcrowded metro or being stuck in insane traffic during rush hour. Plus it's free exercise time that you can combine with commuting time, who wouldn't want that?!

man I still bemoan not being able to have a living situation like I once had. In the city, 3 miles from work. Was mostly walking, bike fairly often, and took the bus if necessary.

Commutes were excluded, meaning the analysis focused on how people moved during their free time when they were allowed to more freely choose how to get from place to place.

So, the numbers below might actually be higher than reported?

Cyclists had a 19 percent lower risk of all-cause dementia, 22 percent lower for Alzheimer’s specifically, a massive 40 percent lower risk for early-onset dementia, defined as dementia that hits before the age of 65, and 17 percent lower for the standard late-onset.

It sure saves your mom a lot of time when she comes bicyclin for that booty late at night to my house. The parking is bad around my place is what I am saying.

Actually though, riding a bicycle is like a super power even if you are only going 5 mph on flat ground, I would be shocked if it wasn't like a superfood for your brain so long as you weren't taking big risks while doing it.

Funny you should mention big risks: I read a study a few months ago that said downhill MTB is still a net gain for your overall health even with the extreme dangers the sport can pose. People really underestimate how dangerous being sedentary is.

Yep. Iirc, cycling is not only the safest way to cross any distance, but it's statistically safer than sitting on a sofa. (Lots of accidents happen at home.)

lol bro whatever, those studies are all funded by big Grizzly Bear so they can get even easier snacks then fishing for salmon