• InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      5 months ago

      They can be for profit.

      But limited, a landlord has 1-2 apartments, not 50, and corporations are right out, as are foreign owners.

      Housing needs to be about housing, healthcare needs to focus on healthcare.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Housing needs to be about housing, healthcare needs to focus on healthcare.

        That’s why I think profit needs to be eliminated from the equation. With it, the priority will always be maximizing profit, with providing a quality product or service being secondary, or even incidental.

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          We used to be able to pull it off, then citizens united and other lobbying meant corporations can ‘add to cart’ any laws they want.

          Break campaign finance and things can actually get better.

    • BirbSeed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Agreed, though I would also be down for more tightly regulated and graded housing similar to our restaurants in the short term.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not just withholding rent, punitive judgements on anything less than best effort on dealing with it as soon as it’s known and inspection schedules that keep the longest duration it can be unknown for short enough to avoid most health issues.