2·
4 hours agoYou do understand people are posting articles from those same news sources, right?
If you don’t want to be on lemmy then just stop going on Lemmy. No one cares.
- 76 Posts
- 3.82K Comments
Joined 11 months ago
Cake day: April 26th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
5·4 hours agoIm already in line for the opening
The all important book tour.
White power steering is hilarious. Who ever made these is great
1·4 hours agoImmersive!
I was saying the news is past tense already. But yes, there’s already multiple discussions about it here as well, if that’s how you want to take it.
2·4 hours agoOh snap!
A night with OPs mom
Heyoooh!
11·9 hours agoAre there UK towns that are expected to buy the biggest dildos? What are the criteria for that?
7·9 hours ago
This is already the top article in the community.
This is old news already. He’s already done it.
Zuckerberg makes decisions that align with business interests rather than ethical considerations.
Noooo waaay
My mom had sex with your cousin!
Heyoooh
Yes that’s today. So?
17·18 hours agoYou can turn vote counts off if you want to.
2·18 hours agoThanks. Maybe i will read it.
That’s true. I’m being optimistic.
I was curious, cuz I wasn’t sure either. Wikipedia has a summary:
It won the Hugo Award for Best Novel in 1960,[3] and was praised by reviewers for its scenes of training and combat and its visualization of a future military.[11][12] It also became enormously controversial because of the political views it seemed to support. Reviewers were strongly critical of the book’s intentional glorification of the military,[13][14] an aspect described as propaganda and likened to recruitment.[15] The novel’s militarism, and the fact that government service – most often military service – was a prerequisite to the right to vote in the novel’s fictional society, led to it being frequently described as fascist.[14][16][17] Others disagree, arguing that Heinlein was only exploring the idea of limiting the right to vote to a certain group of people.
Lol And then for the 1997(!!) movie it says:
The film was directed by Paul Verhoeven (who found the book too boring to finish)
It had the stated intention of treating its material in an ironic or sarcastic manner, to undermine the political ideology of the novel.
They did talk about the content.