Edited title to match articles title.

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Iran literally funds terrorists and advocates for the destruction of Israel

    Israel could invade and conquer Iran tomorrow and they have not.

    Iran’s military is as much a bungling shit-show as Iraq, Russia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, etc. There is no universe in which Israel needs US help to shatter Iran.

    Last time Iran even got close to enriching weapons-grade uranium, Israel launched airstrikes and flattened the plant, completely uncontested and without any reprisal from Iran, who knows they can’t win.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      I doubt Israel could just invade and conquer Iran like that. Having superior equipment is one thing, but actually invading a place will inspire a population to fight against you more than almost anything else, and Iran is a mountainous country that has a population close to 10 times that of Israel. Actually occupying and holding a country like that for any length of time would be a nightmare even for a power like the United States (consider how Afghanistan ended), let alone Israel. They could maybe win a conventional engagement with their superior equipment, sure, and they could do tremendous damage to Iranian infrastructure with bombs or even nukes if they really wanted, but thats not the same as conquering a place.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        They wouldn’t need to hold it. Iran is already primed for revolution. Just create the power vacuum.

        • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          Foreign invasion tends to cause people to rally around their government, or at least put internal conflicts on the backburner, historically, I’d imagine such a strategy would stand a serious chance of actually preventing any revolution that might otherwise take place.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            I don’t see the younger generation of Iran, which was brutally put down over the Hijab protests, coalescing behind their terrorist government.

            • AreaSIX @lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              You really seem to know nothing about the geopolitics of the region. Iranians were put in that position when the regime was much weaker, and everyone united against the invader. Iranians are not likely to welcome anyone who tries to invade as an invasion inevitably massacres civilians, and foreigners killing Iranian civilians won’t be popular with you know, Iranian civilians.

    • AreaSIX @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      “Israel could invade and conquer Iran tomorrow and they have not.”

      Why haven’t they then? Why hasn’t the US? Ever heard of millenium challenge 2002 for example? Invading Iran is not as easy as you seem to think. Iran has a geography that makes invasion very very difficult, strong natural defences. It would have otherwise been already invaded.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        US doesn’t because it isn’t politically feasible, domestically or abroad

        Israel doesn’t because they’re trying to normalize relationships with neighboring countries, and have had a lot of success, which is why Iran funds Hamas.

        Iran’s army is hot garbage and their terrorist government is barely clinging to power as it is.