• mihor@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, the nuance is in the number of people who confirm the change, they must be 50% +1.

    • Fisk400@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So if 50%+1 of people decide that they don’t want to pay artists they can just stop doing that. Sounds iron clad to me.

      • mihor@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s simply the way real decentralization works, I’m afraid.

        • Fisk400@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s what I am fucking saying! You cant design around greedy fucks. Also this whole discussion I participated in the delusion that those 50% were individual people. We both know that they are not because there is nothing to identify individuals so the system is entirely decided by wealth so it isn’t even decentralized. It’s all just a scam that regularly collapses by design because that is how the rich people extract real money from it.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, that’s the way the blockchain works. It’s one way to do decentralisation, a very bad way based on property and absent of trust.

          A much better way to do decentralisation is what you are currently participating in. Federation is based on trust and building communities, not cold maths dictating who owns a bunch of imaginary bullshit.