• forgotaboutlaye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      One big issue is not every country is allowed to make a PS account, which essentially region locks a singleplayer only game. It should be optional, at least.

  • mrfriki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can you imagine a PS5, Switch or XBOX game that required a Steam account in order to play?

    • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      Bunch of pc games out there force you to set up an account with the studio, what are you talking about? This studio happens to be Sony. If HL3 ever releases for console i guarantee that you will need a steam email

    • Viri4thus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Half Life required an account at a time no game required accounts. Most PC games of the 7th gen required GFWL, so much so, without piracy, many are unplayable today. Microsoft still does this I.E. Doom Eternal where you’re required to enter a Bethesda account or the absolute shitshow minecraft has become. Most rockstar games on PC of the last decade required rockstar launcher, including steam releases.

      Other than GFWL, there has been very little pushback on these types of requirements. Funnily enough, sony is the last one to arrive and the one that gets the most pushback… People are weird.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Half Life required an account at a time no game required accounts

        Not disagreeing but it was at least a first-party account and there was a legitimate purpose. PS has none.

        • Viri4thus@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Not disagreeing but what was the legitimate purpose other than growing a platform with a popular game? You know, same as Sony.

          • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            13 hours ago

            The Steam Account is used to distribute updates etc. to the client. The PSN account has no such advantage, it doesn’t help me. How are they the same?

            • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              54 minutes ago

              The only difference between the two is that you despise PlayStation, that’s why you can’t see your bias. Steam gamers think the billionaire who runs steam is THEIR billionaire so they somehow think the company is moral, it isn’t. Steam is every bit as unethical and the rest

              • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 minutes ago

                Are you a Sony shareholder, or a small child? I clearly formulated my criticism: Steam offers me something (downloading of patches, Linux compatibility etc.), while PSN only offers incompatability. They deliberately make their games harder to play than necessary without giving me anything in return.

                Would you like to take your ridiculous straw man back and try again?

            • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              There were often patches for games that you could download from the developers website a the time. Yes, it is a bit more convenient to have a client that will automatically do that for you but it wasn’t necessary.

              People hated steam at the time because it took like 80mb of ram when 256mb of total system ram was not uncommon.

              • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                And how does the developer verify that you actually bought the game before letting you download the patch? Through an account.

                Sure, there were reasons to dislike Steam. That does not mean that PSN account requirements and Steam account requirements are comparable. Unless you can show me where I can use the PSN account to download updates for the games without requiring a Steam account?

                • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  The patch was only the files related to the patch not the entire game. It varied but often the developers required a cd key and the disk to be in your drive in order to play the game. Most often patches were just on the open web free to download. There were counter-examples to this but they were the exception rather than the norm.

                  They’re not comparable now. They are comparable for steam early on to PSN now. PlayStation may be planning to eventually launch a competitor to steam. You would then need a PSN account to download updates.

                  I’m not defending it I don’t want yet another launcher I have to have on my PC or another account I have to keep up with. I probably won’t buy this game unless it has a steep discount and there is a no PSN patch.

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think if I wanted to play EA games online back in the day on PS3 I had to make an account and sign in and I remember how annoying as shit it was trying to type in a password and email with a controller.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I could, it’s not that difficult to imagine. Lots of companies have mandated their own account systems for console games, too.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Sony’s white-knuckle grip on their platform is an exciting hint of things to come.

    They’ve been cosplaying the PS2 era since about 2005. That’s when it became evident to everyone that games can just exist, and be for every platform, so long as the studio has a bit more money and time. Previously your game was for one gizmo, and you might hire some third party to follow up and coerce it onto another gizmo. Nowadays everything’s a computer and all computers work basically the same way. There’s details. There’s exceptions. But anything that doesn’t work the normal way becomes irrelevant.

    This nonsense is the only thing Sony can do to pretend Playstation is anything more than a brand name. Microsoft has stopped pretending and it’s weirding people out. Nintendo had a unique feature for their gizmo, as they do, but now they’re competing with Valve - on hardware - and their follow-up is probably a merely numeric upgrade.

    There are no platforms anymore. To consumers, there is nothing but software and obstacles.

  • flux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Yep. No thanks. Games without online components should have one account to verify and store a copy of the game including saves, etc. That is Steam in this case. If you buy through Steam other accounts should be optional when you want to play online. I’m through with this garbage for offline games.

  • Varyag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is anyone surprised by this? Really? At this stage, after we’ve seen the lenghts that Sony has went to stuff PSN account requirements on even their offline singleplayer games?

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      And all the other games. HD2 is the only one where they ended up going back on it, a few days later it was announced that it would be a requirement for Ghost of Tsushima but no one cared anymore because “Not a requirement for HD2! Yay!”

      • Drewski@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        A lot of the pushback on HD2 was because they initially didn’t require an account, then tried to force it on everyone. It would have locked out a lot of players who had already bought the game, but PSN wasn’t available in their region.