• seejur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You cannot honestly say you support both secularism and this law at the same time. Either you do, or you dont.

    And this law does exactly what you said: impose a belief upon others

    • zipfelwurster@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, it stops you from burning a religious symbol in public. Secularity means that state and church are separate, which is a different matter. A lack of secularity would mean you can go on trial for not following the word of some god e.g. for loving someone from the same sex.

      These are terrible and should be fought.

      Bu this particular law is stopping assholes from being assholes.

      Book-burnings also had a severely terrible history in the 3rd reich and are nothing but demonstrations of power, hate and close-mindedness.

      • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don´t bother my dude, the Islamophobes are triggered and unable to question themselves …

        • n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I view all religions as a threat to humanity. I question the people reading books that were written thousands of years ago and believe the bullshit stories contained within them…

          • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I´m an atheist myself but let´s be reasonable here. While things like not properly separating church and state, religious extremism and fundamentalism are obviously threats to a “free” society, it is an overstatement and a generalization to say religions in general would be.