Developing world needs an alternative to Chinese tech::In April 2022, the United States launched its “Declaration for the Future of the Internet.” It asserts that human rights and democratic values must remain

  • @Elephant0991@lemmy.bleh.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    56
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    While corporate America focuses on mainly profits, “fighting for human rights” are just empty slogan, because corporate America is already exploiting human misery for profits. For government, it’s going to be “to prevent China from becoming the dominant tech power in the developing world” that’s going to drive this sort of initiative, which most likely will have mixed results or fail miserably altogether. Chinese exports are already driving the non-elite consumer markets in the developing worlds.

  • ColorcodedResistor
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3510 months ago

    the developing world gave all its manufacturing to China. we did this to ourselves…ask any electronics repair business from 2010-2023 if we are lucky there is a chinese owned warehouse in California or New York that we can get iphone screens from in a couple days instead of weeks. Bring Manufacturing Back to America and this problem goes the fuck away. I live laugh love technology and the Chinese methodology of steal/copy has its merits,but, China has a baked in Quantity over Quality problem that would go away with manufacturing Competition.

    • @T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2010 months ago

      I’m not sure competition would help too much. The incentive just isn’t good, because companies tend to focus mainly on price, rather than quality. If a factory makes a worse product, but does it for cheaper, then that is what will get picked.

      • @toasteecup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        I think it depends on shopper and circumstance.

        For some shoppers the cheaper item works. For others wanted a better qualiy item isn’t unrealistic, and both are offered on the shelves.

        Add to it, you may want a meh quality hammer when you’re just doing work that would really wreck a nicer one

      • ColorcodedResistor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        i do not like that you are right. the focus on price is too real and I’ve seen it played out enough times in my work experience. And to make the focus on price even worse, if a mom n pop store buys 1 pallet of a product they inherently have to sell it at a higher price than those cucks at walmart who buy 50,000 pallets of something at a time and can/do literally drive out other business because they can sell said product cheaper by volume.

        • @MrSnowy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          This is why we all need to shop local. I can’t remember the last time I’ve been to Walmart

    • @silvercove@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1310 months ago

      This is the best thing that happened to the world in 300 years. The history of the Western World is one of murder, invasions, genocide and imperialism. Now they are finding it harder and harder to invade and murder us as their industrial base diminishes.

      • @FireTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1410 months ago

        Hate to be a downer but murder, invasions, genocide, and imperialism is more of a general humanity thing. China had it’s warring states, Japan had Unit 731, and Cambodia had the Khmer Rouge just to name three examples.

      • @DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Pretty much every large culture, religion or empire in the history of the world is one of murder, invasions and genocide. That’s kind of how they get big, and it’s in no way unique to the modern (last couple hundred years) western world. History is littered with psychopaths all over the world attempting to conquer the world and slaughtering everyone in their path to greatness.

      • QuokkaA
        link
        English
        710 months ago

        Oh yes innocent peaceful China, certainly not the worlds longest running imperialist country ever. How many hundreds of millions have been killed in wars by China?

        • qyron
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          I once saw a documentary on China, in which at some point they visited the National History Museum of China or something alike where there was a huge wall where the nation’s history was depicted.

          The Mao era was a tiny bump on a massive history. That country endured every assault from every foreign influence and power and simply progressed forward.

          They still see themselves as an empire. The empire.

        • @BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The Chinese government has only been in power since the late-40s/early 50s. Do you contribute the deaths by Nazi Germany to the modern German state?

          • QuokkaA
            link
            English
            110 months ago

            Ah China, 50 years of culture!

          • @PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            510 months ago

            One-note support of a regime with talking points rather than actual arguments? Smells like a govbot to me…

            For non-bots: No one I’ve seen here is arguing that America hasn’t done shitty things. If you want to have China be your imperial masters, you have every right to make that decision, but imperialism sucks no matter who’s running it (hint: it’s not just a yt people thing), and China’s international relations strategy isn’t being run for the good of poor countries, but the good of the Chinese state. I think things tend to go better for the poweless when power isn’t unipolar, so poorer countries can play competing interests off each other, but every sovereign nation gets to make that call for themselves.

              • @PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                110 months ago

                Pretty sure I’ve never murdered anyone personally, but I’m actually pretty much constantly talking about my country’s murderous policies. Which ones? Chile? El Salvador? Laos? Iraq? I’m a leftist, I can talk about that shit all day. I think we’re dicks. I’m just also antiauthoritarian, so I think the Chinese government are dicks, too.

    • @GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      810 months ago

      I laughed at the anti-globalists in the 90s. I now realize they were right and I was dumb.

      Redundancy and self-sufficiency are wayyyyy more important than economic efficiency.

      • qyron
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1210 months ago

        Globalization is a good thing. If nations are involved in mutual commerce and trade, that cements relations and facilitates understanding and peace.

        What went very wrong was greed. Every single corporation in the world moved to capitalize on China’s cheap labour and plentiful workforce. And that provided a lot of power for China and other nations, power they are now capitalizing.

        The CoViD scare, with the commercial chain of supply broken, was an harsh recall that having thw entire production sector on the hands of a few of countries comes at a steep price.

        Let’s reindustrialize. Spread production, have redundancies, competing entities.

  • @3arn0wl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    10 months ago
    • BRICS nations are going RISC-V - for varied reasons - as quickly as they can (and the EU may well follow suit).

    • China is a huge producer - if not THE biggest manufacturer - of electronics.

    Those two points alone suggest a RISC-V revolution, in BRICS and 3rd-World economies, who like cheaper goods. RISC-V cores have been used in microcontroller roles for a while now, and we’re now seeing RISC-V chips being used as primary processors.

    • @nephs@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 months ago

      Just like ARM based chips? From low power to main chips?

      Worth mentioning that RISC-V is open source and anyone with the means is allowed to distribute it royalty free.

      • @3arn0wl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        RISC-V designs are still 3 or 4 years off the pace, but closing fast.

        The leap ought to come when the extensions that were ratified at the end of 2021 are realised… 2025/2026.

    • qyron
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 months ago

      Aren’t those chips more efficient as well?

      • @bamboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 months ago

        They can be but it’s up to the hardware implementation moreso than the ISA.

        • qyron
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          What could be the real impact if suddenly the BRICS and other emerging countries turned to that architecture?

          • @3arn0wl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            It would mean the diminishing of market share of proprietary US software and hardware.

            Linux and *BSD run on RISC-V. RISC-V devices will be shipped with an open source OS and apps. Android users won’t even notice / care about what chip is inside their tech.

            And it puts app lock-in to the test.

            • qyron
              link
              fedilink
              English
              810 months ago

              Let’s hope that move happens.

              It would be a blast seeing Linux gathering a lot more influence.

              And the notion of running a fully FOSS based system, down to the hardware root is just wonderful.

  • @hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1210 months ago

    “In April 2022, the United States launched[…]” yet another initiative to cut off China in order to maintain sole superpower status in the world because the US love their monopolies (as long as they’re the one with the monopoly). Then they claim they’re doing this for humanitarian reasons. Idiots believe them while thinking they’re immune to propaganda and shout down and downvote anyone on the internet that presents an opposing view.

  • YⓄ乙
    link
    fedilink
    English
    310 months ago

    Lol anything US and China is a big NO No for me

    • @bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      810 months ago

      The odds you typed that from a device that wasn’t at least in part designed in the US and manufacturered in China are quite low.