• WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        sender, recipient, chatroom, what kind of event you sent (message, emoji, reaction, vote), if you responded to a message, room privilege changes, etc

        but it’s a question how big of a problem is that. they want to tackle it in the future, but that’s far away for now I think

          • breadcat@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            the new cryptographic protocol protects metadata, like signal. the servers know nothing about any encrypted chats

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Zero trust means there’s no trust assumed on the protocol - I.e. it distrusts all actors and the protocol takes steps to work in that trustless environment. I don’t know how that applies specifically to matrix.

              • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Like I said, I don’t know the inner workings of Matrix. But according to the second guy that isn’t you, Matrix has a new tech stack that is zero trust. Now, there are many ways in which that can be true and I don’t know if what Matrix has right now can indeed be considered dissident-level privacy.

                It’s good enough for my threat level (I basically just use it for software support). If I were planning to overthrow a regime, I’d likely go with SimpleX or some other privacy-first messengers.