• NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Ask yourself how you will enforce it and suddenly you’re no longer talking about anarchy.

    this is a no true Scotsman.

    • MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      No we’re talking about definitions. You’re advocating for anarchy being a viable state for humankind, I’m saying practically you can’t enforce or defend its existence without turning it in to something that it is not by definition. It is practically impossible to defend a state of anarchy as it will and always has been overpowered by a more organized, hierarchical force.

      • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        it will and always has been overpowered by a more organized, hierarchical force.

        you can’t prove this