Image alt text: An image of Steam’s top 10 best-selling games at the time of posting, three of which are marked as “prepurchase”

I checked the Steam stats and noticed that in the top 10 best selling games by revenue, there’s three games that aren’t even out yet. If we ignore the Steam Deck and f2p games, it’s three out of four games. They have also been in the top 100 for 4, 6, and 8 weeks respectively, so people just keep on buying them. I would love to know why people keep doing this, as the idea of pre-ordering is that there is a physical copy of a game available for you on release, but this is not a concern with digital items. So after so many games lately being utterly broken on release, why do people not wait until launch reviews to buy the game? If you touch a hot stove and get burned multiple times, when does one learn?

    • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 minutes ago

      This is the first comment I see that actually answers the question. Why on earth are people down voting is beyond me…

      Now though, I’d love to get more details about the thought process as I myself never preorder anything ?

      Edit : I’ve seen your answers to other comments, I guess it makes sense, all good reasons

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 minutes ago

        Yeah people avoid pre ordering because they don’t want to signal to the publishers support for a game before they know it’ll be good. And that’s a perfectly valid reason not to pre order. But it’s also the only reason not to pre order, and it’s more political than practical.

    • junkthief@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Interesting. I can’t see any practical reason TO preorder. Are they going to run out of digital copies? Am I going to forget to buy it? I’d rather wait for reviews and a couple patches.

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago
        • You get content only available if you pre order
        • You get early access to the game
        • You get some amount of later expansion content for free
        • you can preload the game so when it releases, you can just begin playing it.

        There are lots of practical reasons TO preorder something, thought it’s not always all of those things. And you can both preorder something and “Wait for reviews” because the vast majority of the time, reviews release before a game releases.

        For example, Civ 7 comes out on the 11th, if you pre order you get the benefit of getting to play it on the 6th, and the reviews for it all released today, the 3rd. That means I’ll know today if the game sucks and I can just… cancel my preorder if I wanted to. Then in a couple days I get to play the game early, so in case the reviews were all paid for I get to see for myself if I don’t like the game, and if I don’t like it, I can cancel my pre order.

        In case I don’t cancel my pre order, I also save $10 on Civ packs I would otherwise be paying for. If I waited for release day to buy it, I’d lose out on the benefits of pre ordering, but gain nothing.

        • junkthief@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          None of those reasons sound especially practical to me, but I may be in the minority. I’d rather wait and see that the game is stable and if I really want the extra content I’ll get it later (I’m patient).

          I worry that pre ordering may send a message to publishers that a game doesn’t need to be good or even finished

          • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            They are all objectively practical, every single one. They are upsides without a downside. That being said, it’s ultimately your choice whether you choose practicality over the morals of the thing. If you want to choose not to preorder something just to send a message, I get it.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      What if the game launches and you find out everyone is saying it is incomplete, doesn’t run properly, and is crashing their consoles over and over?

      That would be the practical reason I would think of for not just outright purchasing something that hasn’t come out

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        That kind of thing would likely be made known through reviews that come out a few days to a week before release in which case you could just cancel your preorder. And even if they didn’t, Steam’s refund policy doesn’t care if you preordered or not, you can get a refund either way.

        If it’s a console game and the problem is bad enough that it’s crashing consoles, even with refund policies as restrictive as Sony’s, they will issue refunds in cases like that, as we’ve seen a lot of in the past couple years.

        The only actual negative scenario that’s left is you play it and you just don’t like it, and you’re not on PC so you can’t get a refund. But not preordering a game doesn’t really solve that problem. If you buy a game on the PS store two weeks after release and it turns out you don’t like the game you’re no better off than if you pre ordered it and didn’t like it. Generally people don’t pre order games that they’re not sure they’re even going to like.