AI-generated child sex imagery has every US attorney general calling for action::“A race against time to protect the children of our country from the dangers of AI.”

    • ram@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I never said I had evidence. I specifically said there was no evidence. The claim presented is that it’s beneficial, and thte burden of proof lies with the claim.

      • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        And what if CG porn is that help

        That’s not claiming it is benefical. It’s entertaining the idea that what if it is.

        • ram@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then that can be decided by psychologists. It’s funny you keep insisting on calling it “CG porn” though when it’s abjectly and legally child pornography.