A tiny, low-priced electric car called the Seagull has American automakers and politicians trembling.

The car, launched last year by Chinese automaker BYD, sells for around $12,000 in China, but drives well and is put together with craftsmanship that rivals U.S.-made electric vehicles that cost three times as much. A shorter-range version costs under $10,000.

Tariffs on imported Chinese vehicles probably will keep the Seagull away from America’s shores for now, and it likely would sell for more than 12 grand if imported.

But the rapid emergence of low-priced EVs from China could shake up the global auto industry in ways not seen since Japanese makers exploded on the scene during the oil crises of the 1970s. BYD, which stands for “Build Your Dreams,” could be a nightmare for the U.S. auto industry.

“Any car company that’s not paying attention to them as a competitor is going to be lost when they hit their market,” said Sam Fiorani, a vice president at AutoForecast Solutions near Philadelphia. “BYD’s entry into the U.S. market isn’t an if. It’s a when.”

  • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I don’t want a Chinese car but at the same time if American automakers are going to continue refusing to make affordable electric cars and only give massive SUVs and trucks as our gas options then it seems like that’s pretty much the choice we’ll be left with.

    Edit: if this frightens the Biden administration then they need to find a way to put pressure on American manufacturers to make some decent vehicles.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m really not a fan of China, but I’m inclined to agree. We need smaller, more affordable vehicles. SUVs are antiquated, and trucks are largely decorative for most of the population. We need smaller, lighter vehicles. Though we also should be investing much more into mass transit rather than (largely redundant) highways and roads anyways, as it’s a huge waste of taxpayer money. Keep the key highways, build rail to reduce reliance on shit we shouldn’t really be rebuilding anyways. A lot of highways are going to be hitting the end of their useful lives soon, anyways, and require rebuilds.

  • m13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Americans forced the world into the capitalist system, and now they don’t like it when China does capitalism. Why are they so afraid of the free market?

    • thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Except it’s not capitalism when China does it, it’s socialism. The EV manufacturers like BYD have had massive subsidies from the state to bring those products to market, and that level of state support and intervention is not palatable to Americans.

      Political, Climate change and National Security concerns aside, the subsidies are how the US government are about to justify the tariffs.

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        So are massive subsidies only socialism when China does it?

        The US has been doing that for decades.

        • thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          yes but then the US doesn’t expect to sell huge quantities of its cars in China and upset the market. Nor would China permit that.

          • Wogi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            2 months ago

            They not only sell huge quantities of cars in China, they export new and used cars to China for sale.

            They’re not upsetting the market because they’re already a huge part of it.

            Upsetting the market is generally good for consumers. Why exactly would you want to lick the boots of American auto manufacturers when they’re actively price gouging in the absence of any competition?

      • moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        We can talk about the massive subsidies the US government did and do to the automakers. The propaganda paid with tax money to have a centered car environment.

        Each country subsidies its automaker but doesn’t want the other to do so because “Free market™”. It’s at best hypocrite.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s not hard to beat “US craftsmanship”, did the writer saw anything about the cybertruck?

  • Darkscryber@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    A electric car that is not a SUV? I am in!!! Here in Canada the only option for EV are Prius and SUV. No small EV car under 20k. I say bring them on!! Otherwise I will continue to buy juices from arabian country.

  • MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    A tiny, low-priced electric car called the Seagull has American automakers and politicians trembling.

    Hyperbole as rhetorical device is getting exhausting and makes me extremely skeptical.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This whole article is just paid marketing. Some AP journalist didn’t tear this car down and analyze its build quality.

    • Rolder@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Specially when you see the stats and it has a 190-250 mile range and a max speed of 81 MPH. And even the article points out they cut costs with things like having only one windshield wiper.

      • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        it has a 190-250 mile range and a max speed of 81 MPH

        That’s further than I’d drive before a 20 minute rest stop, and faster than it’s legal to drive anywhere in the US, except for Texas State Highway 130.

        And even the article points out they cut costs with things like having only one windshield wiper.

        As opposed to the Cybertruck, which has a revolutionary, but very expensive, design featuring only one windshield wiper.

        • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yeah here in the uk there’s plenty of good charging points, woodland trust and national trust are putting them in at a lot of locations so I could plan a relaxing walk in the woods with my journey if I ever needed to go more than 150 miles, I think that would be really nice.

          Supermarkets have tave them too, so I could plan getting the shopping I need for the trip while it charges, this would allow me to avoid predatory pricing at garages too.

          I just looked on a road distance map and it’s about where I would normally stop for a break, I’ve done longer drives but only rarely and I can’t think of a time an excuse to stop for a walk in the woods wouldn’t have been welcomed.

          Oh and I only have one wiper but it was made by Hyundai so I guess it gets a pass lol

        • Rolder@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Cybertruck is a bad comparison, everyone already knows that thing is a steaming pile of hot garbage.

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t think comparing it to cybertruck is really a win. I could be in a bubble, but I hear nothing but terrible things about them.

          Also, anecdotally, going on long family trips in my van, I frequently do 350 miles between stops on 900 mile trips. I’d say 80 is a typical speed on the Ohio turnpike, but I’d be a little worried about driving that thing pedal to the floor for 2-3 hours straight (no worries though, it’ll never get that range at full speed).

          That said, hey if this car meets your needs I’m all for that. Everyone should have options. I would consider buying one for my kids when they start driving as long as it’s safe in accidents.

  • curiousaur@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Leverage your precious free market capitalism and compete, assholes. It’s not a threat, it’s an opportunity.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      So, there’s a guy Silicon Valley Billionaire named Peter Thiel who released a book back in 2014 called “Zero to One”, in which he advocates for the monopoly system and claims any good businessman ultimately seeks to corner the market.

      The US car market has been consolidating over the last 40 years, in an effort to cartelize and ultimately monopolize the automotive industry. We’ve passed a host of regulations and taxes that compel foreign manufacturers to build and assemble cars domestically, to partner with US car firms, and to absorb parts of the market American firms don’t want to occupy (US firms have functionally given up making small cars - almost everything is a truck or an SUV now). And we’ve unleashed our investment banks on East Asian industries, guaranteeing financial control of the largest firms in Korea, Japan, The Phillipines, and Taiwan via our international system of credits and debits.

      The goal was never free markets, it was captured revenue streams. As we enter a new high surveillance age, vehicles are increasingly part of the always-on Internet Of Things information network used to continuously monitor anyone with enough money to afford a cellular device.

      Excising firms like Huawei, ByteDance, and now BYD from the US marketplace is about cementing that captured state of the American economy and tightening the surveillance network. These are absolutely perceived of as threats, because they don’t integrate into our controlled networks. Until Chinese businesses are willing to submit to Five-Eyes surveillance and the Chicago School Economics of the New York banks, they’re not welcome in our country.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    a threat to US auto industry? You promise? Cus US auto industry is a climate killing powerhouse of gas guzzling SUV’s. Any politicians wanting to pretend to be capitalist, or to be in favor of the environment, let me buy this car.

    • interrobang@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      No one i know under 50 years old wants a giant truck or suv, and thats all they wanna sell us. My only friends with new car $ bought a small wagon, which is all I’d want myself.

      Those huge electric pickups are too heavy for our guardrails on top of everything else; it’s insane and dangerous to let the big three make car culture here even worse.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        No one i know under 50 years old wants a giant truck or suv

        Where could we even park them if we did? My garage barely fits the two sedans my wife and I need to get to work on opposite sides of town, in a city with functionally no mass transit.

        I might not mind owning a single SUV if I used it exclusively for long trips and as a make-shift camping van. But I simply do not have the acreage in my postage-stamp lot size of a three-story walk-up to host more than that. Not that some of my neighbors don’t try, clogging all the sidewalks and curb spaces with their monster trucks.

      • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Then you just don’t know many people. Or live in a bubble. I see people in their twenties driving trucks in the richest city in my state known for being a hyper liberal college town.

      • LowtierComputer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I know so many boomers with fucking monster vehicles. Even my car nut friends daily drive sedans and small EV’s. We’re not idiots or rich.

        • Ozone6363@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          We’re not idiots or rich

          So poor people drive smaller, cheaper cars. Got it.

          You’re just in different circles, I suppose.

  • ansiz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve seen enough QA issues with most of the Chinese EVs I would highly doubt any of them make it to the USA for consumer sale at any scale. Some have overheating issues, panels fall off, cheap seat belts, uncomfortable seats, sizing issues (too small for larger Americans), goofy AC vents that blow weak when pointed downward and high when pointed at your face but don’t allow for other adjustments.

    • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      BYD has been making buses and work trucks for the US market for years. I’ve only had a ride on a few BYD buses, but they seem to be quality.

      • ChewTiger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Good to hear they’ve had some success in the US, but I do worry about the quality of their consumer products. Too many companies can’t translate success in onr section of a market into another section.

        I really want a small EV.

    • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean at those prices you don’t expect too much quality. Unlike Teslas that are poorly built but priced like the aren’t

    • rowinxavier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree with many of these points, but have two thoughts here. First, the same was true of many items being produced in China in the past, but quality control got better and honestly most of the products you can buy for a reasonable price are partly or wholly made in China. Second, Tesla is a good example of a US based company with many of the same issues. Loose panels, door handles that fall off, accelerators that get stuck, and so on. Bad engineering is not only available in Mandarin.

      I hope they can produce a good quality electric car and help accelerate the transition.

    • Ozone6363@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      1000% this.

      This article is fuckin ridiculous. There hasn’t been a Chinese auto manufacturer that is even CLOSE.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s easy to build a cheap car when you ignore the human rights of your workers and the environmental damage of your production process.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Lol western nations dint give a fuck about that. They just externalized the environmental costs to China and other poor nations until now and then sold the end result to their customers. The only problem is that that US doesn’t own the company.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ford when they outsourced to South Africa during their apartheid for cheap exploit labor

      All 3 American automakers who already outsourced to Mexico right now to do the exact same thing

      Yellen telling China to scale back eco tech production to protect American profits

      Ah yes America, the global leader in human rights and environmental protection.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Problem is, that goes for expensive cars as well.

      At some point we need to decide are we in the West are either (a) importing cheap small cars from China, or (b) stopping poor people from driving. Because petrol is on the way out.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s why ebikes and scooters are becoming so popular. Small short range mobility vehicles are filling the gap.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think that’s the key tbh. Most people aren’t going to need a massive car for going about town. Just something that can carry your shopping and get you to work and back will do.

          • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I just wish I didn’t have to choose between a small car and a car that won’t get stuck in the snow. I don’t know why they think small cars must also have a small ground clearance.

    • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Or our businesses don’t want this type of competition? An affordable and reliable sub 10k EV? This would hurt our businesses and billionaire class, no?

      If I needed a new car, and had a 10k EV as an option, it’d be my first choice to look into.

      Por que no los dos, though.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Our businesses can’t compete because we don’t want poison in our air/water, cars made with child labor, or factories that regularly maim or kill employees.

        • exanime@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Is that why all the manufacturing of every industry (including most of the parts for the cars assembled in USA) was sent from America to China?

        • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s okay when we do it because our factories at least looks clean and modern despite all that shit happening anyway.

            • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Translation: I’ve brought into the idea that america is the best and therfore without any evidence I’ll assume that every bad thing that happens is worse in China.

              It’s weird that people acknowledge china has made huge investments in modernizing industry while america has not but then act like investing trillions in high tech manifacturing has changed nothing and the country is still just guys in pointy straw hats scratching at the dirt.

              Go look at the dji factory, it’s a beautifully elegant engineering masterpiece as or more advanced than any western factory. The design is efficient, robust, and retoolable with workers getting good wages and a range of benefits that rival or exceed similar employment in Europe or the US, most working 9-5 in good safe conditions with adequate breaks.

              MiC25 the project to invest in and promote Chinese tech manifacturing is reaching maturity and exactly what was intended and expected is happening. The lesson should be that investing in infrastructure and modernization is a great idea but instead people want to dismiss that and say ‘no surely things are always better here in the west where the only investments we make are bailing out the rich every time they fuck up’

              Yes china has a lot of problems like any county, just assuming that everything they do is evil and terrible makes no sense.

              • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I don’t think America is the best either, just less bad than China in most cases.

                still just guys in pointy straw hats scratching at the dirt.

                As of 2023, 40% of the Chinese workforce is engaged in farming, primarily at the small scale. Your racist implications aside, a large portion of the country is still relatively undeveloped.

                China executes more than 1000 people every year, sometimes for things which are protected rights in the US like political dissidence (aka free speech). They are the #1 country in numbers of executions. They kill more people than the next 10 countries on the list combined.

                China is the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases; the largest source of marine debris; the worst perpetrators of illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing; and the world’s largest consumer of trafficked wildlife and timber products.

                The Chinese government regularly spies on its own citizens, censors what their citizens know, and manipulates them with propaganda.

                China has 5 times the workforce as the US but 16 times the workplace fatality rate. More than 225 Chinese people die from workplace accidents.

                China regularly holds more than 1 million people in internment camps. In these camps many are abused, tortured, raped, or used as slave labor. That is on top of the 1.7 million people in the penal system where torture is regularly used as punishment.

                But yeah, they have one or two nice looking factories.

    • Ozone6363@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The car still sucks ass, dude. Literally no one is buying cheap Chinese shit that has a million problems. They’re not even close.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Even if there are no trade barriers, it would be very unsafe to drive a tiny car like this in the US due to the number of gigantic trucks and SUVs on the streets.

    This is why new cars has been getting bigger and bigger and leading to this “car size arms race”.

        • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Don’t get me wrong, I don’t like that cars have been getting bigger and bigger either, they are unsafe for everyone but the occupants and they wear out the roads faster, but it is just something that is still actively happening.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I just got off the freeway jockeying for position with trucks whose hoods are the height of my entire car, so I am acutely aware that it’s happening. It’s just yet another way that I feel like an alien in my birth country.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Those are just excuses:

        • Dumping: US auto industry is enjoying significant protectionism right now, with the excuse of combatting dumping. They have a grace period to catch up, but instead they’re backing off, retreating into their shells. We’re spending hundreds of billions of dollars to give them a chance to compete fairly and they’re throwing it away. I’ll have sympathy if they at least try.
        • Surveillance: US auto industry and especially EVs are horrible with surveillance right now. You not only have no privacy, they commonly have cameras inside and can control your vehicle remotely. Those Chinese surveillance devices aren’t doing anything different from anyone else: they’re all violating our privacy and we have no protection. It’s not that I’m not afraid of Chinese surveillance devices but that I’m also afraid of US corporate surveillance devices. Let a have some actual privacy protections we can apply equally and fairly to all of them
        • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Those are just excuses

          They might be used as excuses by a complacent industry, but they are not just excuses. They are also valid reasons for concern, and would still be so even if not used as talking points for Detroit lobbyists.

          US auto industry is enjoying significant protectionism right now

          Regardless of that, China’s government has spent more than a few years subsidizing products and services in order to make their exports dirt cheap abroad, eventually making other nations dependent on them. (See also: the Belt and Road Initiative.) This fits the same pattern, and would still be a problem even if US auto industry protectionism didn’t exist.

          US auto industry and especially EVs are horrible with surveillance right now.

          Agreed, but once again, that doesn’t invalidate the problem that I mentioned. A foreign adversary having deep, real-time access to the nation’s infrastructure, traffic patterns, sensitive information revealed through conversations and cameras, etc. is a larger problem than the personal privacy issues that already exist domestically.

          Chinese surveillance devices aren’t doing anything different from anyone else: they’re all violating our privacy and we have no protection.

          The difference lies in where the collected information goes. That might not matter to some people on a personal level, but on a national scale, handing all that info to an adversary nation is cause for concern.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            As opposed to them buying it from data brokers? There’s a difference in responsiveness and I’m sure data brokers make a pretense of anonymizing that will need a bit of adjustment, but I’m not convinced it’s as different as everyone is afraid of

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I look at both sides here, where every new vehicle has a chip that tell the auto makers just about everything about you … but cheap, well-made EVs should be available to the average Joe, not just the wealthy.

      What pisses me off the most is the Big Three have gotten billions in subsidies/corporate welfare, and instead of creating cheap EVs to fill the market they build gas-guzzling SUVs and full-sized trucks for $60k+ per.

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        They have to sell cars. I hear the EV F-150 is selling like shit despite all the interest online, which really disappoints me. I couldn’t be happier with my Chevy Volt (other than it’s too low to the ground for my body to comfortably climb in and out of) and many would say it’s the best PHEV - or at least was for its time. The Bolt consistently ranks very highly among EVs. I absolutely disagree that American car manufacturers are dropping the ball here. They are trying to figure out how to make and sell these cars to consumers who have made clear they want trucks and SUVs with the cargo/passenger capacity for trips.

        Cost of labor is higher here, but not nearly enough to explain this price difference (and is anyone suggesting we shouldn’t pay autoworkers good wages?). Something doesn’t add up. Corners have to have been cut to create an EV half the cost of everyone else. I welcome fair competition to help drive prices down, but I’ll wait to see what happens. I’m super skeptical of any miracle solution, particularly when the verbiage about it has such an emotionally charged tone.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Chevy Volt … Bolt consistently ranks very highly among EVs. I absolutely disagree that American car manufacturers are dropping the ball here.

          They’re not dropping the ball, they’re throwing it away. You’re giving two examples that have been our best hope for affordable EVs but are no longer made

  • A'random Guy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t even like buying Chinese shoes because they fall apart before the season ends. Do these shoes spy on us as well ?