• ExfilBravo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    "We don’t have any competition for these Chinese EV’s so our plan is to price the American public out of buying one even though we don’t have any cheap alternative EVs in America. We are so fucked here. If we don’t vote Biden we get straight up fascism if we vote for Biden we get a continued oligarchy. Great choices guys!

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is dumb. Americans are being ripped off by car prices and manufacturers who aren’t investing in this cheaper tech.

    The Chinese cars are cheap because they’re going back to basics. Compared to any US DOT approved vehicle, they’re slow, they’re light, they don’t have any bells and whistles. Four wheels, a motor, some simple electronics, and a battery.

    Ultimately, that’s all you need to get from one place to the next if you don’t need highway speeds or crash ratings…

    Will high tariffs cause local manufacturers to develop their own version of cheap electric vehicles? Doubtful.

    • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      My thought as well, the video Tom Scott did on the mountain town that has bespoke electric vehicles (and strict usage on them for needed business) comes to mind (R2oD1ZHNMFE). I don’t know how much is law and how much is companies not caring to cater to that market (even with designs that they sell in Europe), but Kei-like vehicles can still be affordable without being fully unsafe (but the issue of safety is more about the market making larger-and-larger trucks and SUVs, and lack of viable car alternatives paired with high speed limits).

      Higher cost really is not a fix. Other concerns like privacy seem like policy could mesh well with low-end (no internet connection, just-a-radio, common off-the-shelf parts, standards+no DRM etc). It would be nice for the option to exist in this space that US car companies are not trying to fill anyway.

      @Fiivemacs

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is very much a mixed bag of news - while it sucks to force ridiculously high tariffs on EV imports the Chinese EV market is currently unsustainably subsidized by the government and domestic companies wouldn’t be able to compete. If we want to grow our domestic EV automakers we can’t let them be forced to sell vehicle at a perpetual loss.

    This is made even more complicated by the fact that EV manufacturing is already being heavily domestically subsidized by PE money - I believe one of the manufacturing startups is currently losing 350k on every car they sell.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    China is becoming an increasingly unreliable trade partner. Preventing them from taking over more of America’s economy is prudent.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Oh yeah, because there’s still cars made in America where the workers get decent wages and working conditions …

      Like, I’m sure they don’t in China either.

      But what’s the difference between a Chinese oligarch who doesn’t pay American taxes and an American oligarch who doesn’t pay American taxes?

      I’m sure there’s a couple besides if someone’s wealth changes GDP, but are there any that make up for all Americans getting access to affordable EVs?

      This move is terrible for the average American, so some different billionaires will make more money then they can spend.

      Even if you want to make the case it helps auto workers (it really doesn’t) they make up a little over 1% of Americans.

      Biden is hurting 100 Americans to “help” 1, because even that US autoworker could buy the affordable EV if they were sold here

      Hell, isn’t capitalism supposed to be built on the free market? If these billion dollar corporations can only exist if we ban their competition, shouldn’t capitalists be screaming to let them burn?

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        In a completely capitalist market, American manufacturers would be paying Americans less money to make the cars, and if they couldn’t find people, they’d move the manufacturing out of the country. Why would they keep a factory here in the US if they could pay Mexicans to build them and ship them to the US with no tariffs (fucked up lobbying and a lousy government has sort of made this example happen, actually)? US auto worker are paid around $18 to $35 an hour. Chinese auto workers average (converted to US currency) $2 to $3.50 an hour.

        So you tell me. Do you really want to go pure capitalism, no holds barred, and try to compete with a country paying their people $3 an hour without moving your own manufacturing out of the US? Do you know how many jobs in the US exist only because there’s tariffs in place? Do you know that just like Honda, Toyota and other foreign car manufacturers have done, China can avoid most of the tariffs by building their vehicles in the US, instead of shipping all of them in? Getting rid of tariffs would lower the wages of nearly every job you could get in the US. When millions of jobs leave the US, it makes it real easy for a capitalist to start paying less to desperate people, and start thinking that what you’re being currently paid is too much.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    America is having record fossil fuel production…

    It’s one of the few things keeping “the economy” afloat on paper.

    If Biden let Americans buy affordable Chinese EVs, that hurts the American GDP numbers in a couple ways.

    Neoliberals care about GDP more than CEOs care about stock price.