recursive_recursion they/them@lemmy.ca to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 days agoPirates Rejoice! Meta/Facebook Condones Piracy if Seeding Can't be Proven.arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up1154file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldnottheonion@lemmy.worldpulse_of_truth@infosec.publegalnews@lemmy.zipmeta@lemdro.id
arrow-up1154external-linkPirates Rejoice! Meta/Facebook Condones Piracy if Seeding Can't be Proven.arstechnica.comrecursive_recursion they/them@lemmy.ca to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square5fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldnottheonion@lemmy.worldpulse_of_truth@infosec.publegalnews@lemmy.zipmeta@lemdro.id
cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/18686776 Meta claims torrenting pirated books isn’t illegal without proof of seeding
minus-squarerecursive_recursion they/them@lemmy.caOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up48·edit-22 days agoI’m half meming with the title but at the same time Meta publicly claiming that pirating books isn’t illegal if there’s no proof of seeding seems real ridiculous Zuck continues to display true idiocy at work: rules for thee but not for capitalists
minus-squarematey@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 days agoOn the other hand, making new precedent?
minus-squareNight Monkey@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 days agoWell. That statement isn’t completely wrong. If there is no evidence and can’t be proven
I’m half meming with the title but at the same time Meta publicly claiming that pirating books isn’t illegal if there’s no proof of seeding seems real ridiculous
Zuck continues to display true idiocy at work:
On the other hand, making new precedent?
Well. That statement isn’t completely wrong. If there is no evidence and can’t be proven