Look at the right hand, it has like two fingers/stubs. Or that “vehicle” in the background. All the details are completely off. I’ve been fooled by AI photos too, but this is not one of them.
And you can just as easily fake that data. Unless an image is cryptographicly signed right off the sensor, I wouldn’t put any weight in something being real or fake nowadays. Is this image probably fake, ya, but that’s using common sense not a “fake ai detector”.
Is there not enough about Musk to hate without resorting to AI slop that reduces everything odious about him to “Elon fat”?
afaik AI detectors are no better than random chance
You’d have to be blind to think that’s not AI. The details don’t make any sense and the proportions are just weird.
I agree with you, but that’s also an accurate description of Elon Musk.
His are a distinctly different set of weird proportions.
You’re not wrong but AI crap is still AI crap. (I get it, memes are memes etc etc…)
I’m pretty blind when it comes to these things
Look at the right hand, it has like two fingers/stubs. Or that “vehicle” in the background. All the details are completely off. I’ve been fooled by AI photos too, but this is not one of them.
¯\(ツ)/¯
You can embed metadata into images, so there is some efficacy to AI image detectors.
Ai text detectors are snake oil
And you can just as easily fake that data. Unless an image is cryptographicly signed right off the sensor, I wouldn’t put any weight in something being real or fake nowadays. Is this image probably fake, ya, but that’s using common sense not a “fake ai detector”.
For text that’s true, my understanding was that it’s better for photos.
I have no problem going lower than they do! I get if you’re not into it, but I am going to shit on this fucker for the rest of my life