Belgium authorities are getting worried by a series of school arsons believed to be connected to newly mandatory school sessions in some parts of the country.

  • Murvel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh well, let us just wonder as to what group might be responsible.

    Several Islamic groups have also condemned the program in a joint statement, fearing it will favor “hypersexualization” of children.

    Ah well.

    Surprise!

        • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wonder why, when the article clearly shows that this is an interfaith movement toward intolerance and violence, the comment OP chose only to highlight Islamic involvement

        • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          We both already know the answer. It’s the people whose bigotry you chose to ignore when you were singing out muslims for being bigots.

          • Murvel@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, we don’t both know the answer. That’s just you making assumptions, I’m guessing, based on your political views. I’m not ignoring anything I quoted the article, simple as.

      • Murvel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Also points a number of other fingers…

        What does this even mean?

        Anyway, this is the energy you need to embrace if you care about a secular society. And fuck it all if I ever submit to religious fanatical cooks.

        • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I genuinely shouldn’t be surprised your reading comprehension level is so low. Idk what I expected of this interaction tbh.

          • Murvel@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s your English lacking, I don’t understand what you mean even, explain.

            Point other fingers at what? It’s like you tried to write a complete sentence and failed…

            • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Where are you from :)?

              Maybe the intended idiom, or either of the other 2 interpretations of the wording, have confused you because of nationality differences?

              • Murvel@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                What in the everloving fuck are you talking about? I’m asking you to explain what you meant, when you said to

                also point a number of other fingers

                It’s not even an idiom. It just sounds like you just misquoted the actual idiom ‘pointing fingers at’

                • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  At this point It’s going to be more fun for myself to leave you in the dark.

                  You may always wonder from this moment onward why people upvoted me and down-voted you.

                  One day when you least expect it, I’ll give you a hint :)

                  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’ll spoil it for them: it’s because they’re dumb, combative, openly chauvinistic and convinced that anything they can’t understand is the fault of the person explaining it to them when what you said was clear, concise and demonstrably correct.

                  • catsan@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I also didn’t understand what you meant by that. What did you mean by that?

                  • Murvel@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Oh, grow up, I don’t care about points, lmao. I just thought you wanted to discuss the subject, why else waste the time.