GitCode, a git-hosting website operated Chongqing Open-Source Co-Creation Technology Co Ltd and with technical support from CSDN and Huawei Cloud.

It is being reported that many users’ repository are being cloned and re-hosted on GitCode without explicit authorization.

There is also a thread on Ycombinator (archived link)

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Solution: create a GitHub repo with Markdown articles outlining human rights abuses by the CCP and have a large number of GitHub users star and fork the repo.

    • Colonel Panic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’ve heard of CamelCase and lowercase and intVariableName variable naming styles. Get ready for:

      for (int Taiwan == 0; Taiwan < HongKong; Taiwan++) { int TianamenSquare == 0; … }

    • Tramort@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s the whole point of this: they will automatically filter that out, and this is an impotent, though well intended, gesture.

      • Morphit @feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        How will they filter it out? If they just don’t mirror anything with ‘forbidden’ terms, we can poison repos to prevent them being mirrored. If they try to tamper with the repo histories then they’ll end up breaking a load of stuff that relies on consistent git hashes.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      create a GitHub repo with Markdown articles outlining human rights abuses by the CCP

      Once you have logged “China killed 100 Zillion people! End CCP now!” in Chinese GitHub, everyone in China will realize that their lives are actually very bad and they need to do a Revolution immediately.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    The vast majority of projects on GitHub is open-source and forkable, why would that need authorization?

    It’s… suspicious that China’s doing it en masse, but there’s nothing wrong in cloning or forking a repo last i heard.

    • passepartout@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not about authorization. They want to build a knowledge base for when the Great Firewall gets some more filters. Just like russias mirror of wikipedia which is heavily edited to discredit the west.

      • 31337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        This seems like the most plausible explanation. Only other thing I can think of is they want to develop their own CoPilot (which I’m guessing isn’t available in China due to the U.S. AI restrictions?), and they’re just using their existing infrastructure to gather training data.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Just like russias mirror of wikipedia which is heavily edited to discredit the west.

        How come I live in Russia and have never seen such?

        I know only of quite a few troll\counterculture projects, some, like Lurkmore, are already, well, dead, some, like Traditsiya, are not.

        That, of course, if you don’t mean that Russian Wikipedia in itself has problems. Which would be true.

  • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    With the obligatory “fuck everyone who disregards open source licenses”, I am still slightly amused at this raising eyebrows while nearly no one is complaining about MS using github to train their copilot LLM, which will help circumvent licenses & copyrights by the bazillion.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      nearly no one is complaining about MS using github to train their copilot LLM

      What rock have you been living under??

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      while nearly no one is complaining about MS using github to train their copilot LLM,

      Lots of people complained about that. I’ve only seen this single thread complaining about this.

    • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Came here to say this. As much as I don’t like china, there is really nothing to see (apart from the source, that’s for everybody to see).

      • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        This could be illegal for git repos that do not have a open source license that allows mirroring or copying (BSD, Apache, Mit, GPL, etc.) Sometimes these repos are more “source available” and the source is only allowed to be read, not redistributed or modified. I would say that this is more of a matter for each individual copyright holder, not Microsoft.

        But ultimately I agree, this really isn’t as big of a deal as people are making.

        edit: changed some wording to be clearer

  • Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is inevitable:

    Once the people in China can only see the CCP’s version of everything,

    & ALL stuff has been adulterated, either by AI or by some agency-or-other,

    THEN dissent should die-down in the Chinese population:


    Read Lanier’s “Foreign to Familiar” to understand how Tropical-Culture vs Nordic-Culture shapes people, & how old-cultures vs new-cultures shape people,

    then read Hofstede’s “Exploring Culture” to understand the dimensions of culture that his Cultural Dimensions Theory digs into ( power-distance, uncertainty-avoidance, “success”-orientation, & other dimensions )…

    & when you understand how we’re kind of “template” people, before being born into culture,

    but once born into it, our entire meaning gets framed within whatever culture we were born into…

    therefore, the CCP can simply remove most diversity-of-meaning from their completely-possessed-population, through a generation or 2 of that.

    Tibetan, Uyghur, Hongkonger, Taiwanese, Indian, South-Korean, Japanese, the intent is consistent: "the destruction of " … others … “is the midwife of Chinese supremacy”.


    I expect a similar kind of program to exist in all right-possessed countries, as the right is doing in the US, right now, with burning or banning books, eradicating proper education, suppressing libraries, etc, they’re just doing the same thing as what the CCP’s doing, only less-skillfully, is all.

    No real difference in their deeper heart/motivation/intent, though: supremacism, crushing/destroying all “other” kinds.

    Russia’s big on it, too, isn’t it?

    Islamism…

    The “Crusades” were good examples of this kind of idiocy?

    The “Inquisition”?

    The “Buddhist” genociding of Tamils?

    So long as the “home” story is … “coherent”, & “justifies” all, then … kids grow up … believing, right?


    There’s a book, & a Big Think yt video, on “Collective Illusions”, which is important!

    Please invest in seeing that video, & see how it’s actually a delusion-mechanism in our minds…

    …used by political-forces, yes, but they couldn’t use it if it didn’t exist, could they?

    _ /\ _

  • kersplomp@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Some random Chinese company: does something jenky

    Blogger: “The entire country of China is doing this jenky thing!”

  • romp_2_door@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    fun to think that my shitty program is now stored in an artic vault and stored in some Chinese servers

    So many bugs I never fixed and yet here we are lol

    • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I do believe it’s illegal if they take a repository with a restrictive license (which includes any repository without a license), and then make it available on their own service. I think China just doesn’t care.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah… The main thing I see here is that China (read; government , not the people, not being racist here) will take this code, they will make improvements on it, they will NOT give back. Basically like Microsoft, but now an entire country.

    Chinese government hasn’t exact had a good reputation when it comes to taking technology and not giving anything back

  • csm10495@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s a bit odd, but isn’t it equivalent to forking and putting up a fork elsewhere?

    I guess I don’t see the problem.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It will be funny to see folks who spent the last ten years posting “It’s not stealing, it’s copying” memes suddenly find religion because Evil Foreign People got involved.

      • Klear@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m quite scared of how AI apparently pushes people in favour of significantly stricter copyrights. This is not a good trend.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          This isn’t people being influenced by AI. This is Microsoft’s Godzilla battling the RIAA/MPAA’s King Kong.

          The trend, to date, has been consolidation of media properties under fewer and more hegemonic distributors. And now we’re seeing a couple of economic Titans battle over the position of “Last Legitimate Music Vendor”.