• kevindqc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      So who do you think hacked the DNC and got their emails, then? Is it the same people who hacked the RNC but didn’t leak the emails? What makes you more qualified than CrowdStrike on this?

      • StaySquared@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        U.S. intelligence officials cannot make definitive conclusions about the hacking of the Democratic National Committee computer servers because they did not analyze those servers themselves. Instead, they relied on the forensics of CrowdStrike, a private contractor for the DNC that was not a neutral party, much as “Russian dossier” compiler Christopher Steele, also a DNC contractor, was not a neutral party. This puts two Democrat-hired contractors squarely behind underlying allegations in the affair – a key circumstance that Mueller ignores.

        • btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/aug/18/donald-trump-us-senate-report-russia-campaign

          A report by the Senate intelligence committee… runs to nearly 1,000 pages and goes further than last year’s investigation into Russian election interference by special prosecutor Robert Mueller… identifies Konstantin Kilimnik as a Russian intelligence officer employed by the GRU, the military intelligence agency behind the 2018 poisoning of the Russian double agent Sergei Skripal. It cites evidence – some of it redacted – linking Kilimnik to the GRU’s hacking and dumping of Democratic party emails.