• yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      2 months ago

      A better statement should be: you should remain vigilant and light on attachment to any banner. If an ill wind blows and you don’t like it, it’s time to move. Control your data- aspire to be a digital nomad.

      Firefox isn’t without it’s own issues, recently. Google used to be viewed as a paragon once, too.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t use the password manager in Firefox, what a terrible idea.

      Use an independent password manager, something purpose-built.

      And using Linux? Hahaha, right, right. Call me when there’s a serious OneNote, or even more importantly, Excel competitor. (Or even a standard shell on Linux, or the same set of tools built in).

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Use an independent password manager, something purpose-built.

        Why? You’re talking as if browser password managers aren’t purpose-built. “I love entering a password to fill my passwords for me instead of entering a password” —statement dreamed up by the utterly deranged. (I think we all should just use auto-locking.)

        OneNote

        Web-based stuff like Notion and Google Keep

        Excel

        LibreOffice Calc with Tabbed UI

        standard shell

        what is that

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Firefox Sync was purposefully built too, they didn’t wake up one day to find it on the porch in a basket.

        It syncs passwords, works on desktop and mobile and can do some other cool stuff — syncs tabs and bookmarks, alerts you to password breaches, send tabs from one device to another, lets you export your passwords etc. It’s a good password manager.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It is not the software which can lack seriousness, but the developer and the user. One is proprietary where the developer controls the user’s computing - the other is free software where the user is in control (free as in freedom).