• KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not under the impression it would unseat PNG anytime soon, but “we have a current standard” isn’t a good argument against it. As images get higher and higher quality, it’s going to increase the total size of images. And we are going to hit a point where it matters.

    This sounds so much like the misquoted “640K ought to be enough for anybody” that I honestly can’t take it seriously. There’s a reason new algorithms, formats and hardware are developed and released, because they improve upon the previous and generally improve things.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      My argument is not “we have a current standard”, it’s “people don’t give enough of a shit to change”.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        People don’t need to give a shit, you just need websites and servers and applications to produce and convert images to the new format and the rest will happen "by itself’

        It should be pretty much invisible to the users themselvea

          • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Why would you think that sysadmins and application devs wouldn’t want to use JPEG XL?

            I’m a developer and I like the format

            • NateNate60@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Because I am a developer and I have also been a sysadmin, and I really do not care. Yes, the format is good but I’m not particularly excited for it.