I know MediaBiasFactCheck is not a be-all-end-all to truth/bias in media, but I find it to be a useful resource.

It makes sense to downvote it in posts that have great discussion – let the content rise up so people can have discussions with humans, sure.

But sometimes I see it getting downvoted when it’s the only comment there. Which does nothing, unless a reader has rules that automatically hide downvoted comments (but a reader would be able to expand the comment anyways…so really no difference).

What’s the point of downvoting? My only guess is that there’s people who are salty about something it said about some source they like. Yet I don’t see anyone providing an alternative to MediaBiasFactCheck…

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    1 month ago

    Some people are pissed that the format is spammy? That’s the complaint I’ve heard.

    I’d certainly prefer something like post tagging/labels but within the current feature set of lemmy I think it’s about as good as it could be.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s my gripe with it. Its single comment fills the entire screen of my phone when scrolling past and it uses gigantic font, a big separator line (?), and links mixed with text mixed with more links.

      Additionally, it fucks with the “new comment” and “hot” sorting, depending on how active Lemmy is at the time, by spamming post after post with a comment even though there is no actual discussion happening.

      • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 month ago

        You should use a client that supports all of the text formatting. On Voyager the bot’s comment is smaller than most when collapsed (which it is by default).

        • Alteon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, I’m not changing my entire client that I’ve gotten used to just to deal with a single bot that annoys me.

        • Vanon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes we can. It’s in my blocked users, like any others (using Sync app). I’ve blocked it mostly because the formatting is lazy and word count excessive. It just “gets in the way”. Plus I generally already know the bias of most reputable sources, as do most news junkies.

            • Pika@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Looking at the buttons that they give me when I’m commenting it looks like it does support spoilers when done in the >!text!< syntax, but the other alternative version definitely took over.

              I’ve never seen the ::: spoiler text ::: version work

                • Pika@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  That’s great to hear, I love eternity as a client because none of the other ones that I’ve tried so far have come close to what I’m looking for in a UI and I like the ability to block comments and posts by specific keywords, it really helps when the entire platform as a whole becomes hyper focused on one subject because I can just add that subject to the block list and filter out the flood

          • AnActOfCreation@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Like I commented above, I wonder if other spoiler tags work in Sync or if there’s something about the way this bot posts that breaks it.

    • Don_Dickle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 month ago

      I have never seen a bot that does good. Got sick of them on reddit and other sites. So when I see it here which is my safe haven. I will downvote or report it because it has not place here.

        • Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That’s what I said and was down voted for it. Oh well, that’s life on lemmy.

          Also did that, blocked the bot.

        • Don_Dickle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 month ago

          Fuck that…not getting on admins or anything but sites need to get rid of bots unless they pay the site. And also get rid of clickbait shit that I saw on reddit but not here yet.

          • Bob Robertson IX@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            40
            ·
            1 month ago

            So, because you don’t like bots, they shouldn’t be made available to others who appreciate them? Fuck that.

            The beauty of Lemmy is that you are in control of what you see, but that makes that you have to control it. Stop trying to dictate that I can’t have bots from instances that allow them.

          • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            1 month ago

            The bot is made by the instance admins themselves, so don’t expect the bot to go away.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        out of personal curiosity, are you seeing this with the bots setting turned off? I thought that setting was a universal setting that just hide all bot posts for the account