The only alternatives mentioned were Threads and Bluesky.

    • CMLVI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s…actually a cool AF idea/inplementation of Fediverse shit. A practical use as well, as they’d control who was on the instance and would be a sorta pseudo-verification process for any accounts on it’s own.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think it’s perfect for governments. You can subscribe anywhere, you know it’s legit, and that’s a much better way to do notifications than twitter.

        • CMLVI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah I’m not entirely well-versed in the implications of what that would allow, but it’s another use-case that would be cool to see!

      • veee@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        3 months ago

        The government could control social media on their own instance, sure.

        I think having government accounts come from an official instance would garner more trust in the platform.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s not… it’s the fediverse. I’m completely fine with them having their own instance, it’s not like they control it by any means. Hell they can be defederated. It’s a lot better than them choosing some random instance.

      • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think the distributed nature of Mastodon keeps government control from being an issue. It would be kind of cool as a space for citizens to ask for assistance or air grievances while giving the politicians an officially owned space for things like announcements.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Totally agree. The issues with “government-controlled social media” are a non-issue in a federated environment, and the URL would give them legitimacy.

      • Flamekebab@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t want a private company controlling government email servers, why would I want them to control government social media platforms?