U.S. District Judge Mark Scarsi’s ruling came in a lawsuit filed in June by three Jewish students at UCLA. The students alleged that they experienced discrimination on campus during the protest because of their faith and that UCLA failed to ensure access to campus for all Jewish students.
“In the year 2024, in the United States of America, in the State of California, in the City of Los Angeles, Jewish students were excluded from portions of the UCLA campus because they refused to denounce their faith.” Scarsi wrote.
I have no idea, and people do do some ignorant shit in the name of protests sometimes, but I’m just waiting to hear that this was either (a) some kind of horseshit exaggeration of an underlying reality that bears only a vague resemblence to what the Jewish students are saying happened, or else (b) a false flag.
Can UCLA and police violently assault protesters?
What’s the judges ruling on the real crime that happened not this imagined racism bullshit?
In the year 2024, in the United States of America, in the State of California, in the City of Los Angeles, students were violently assault by police forces and pro-Israeli protestors of the UCLA campus because they refused to accept genocide”.
I understand the students blocked access to the classrooms, but this makes it sound like they were singling out Jewish students and blocking them.
Many of the protestors were Jewish themselves. Those people reporting that they were blocked were zionists who took exception to the protestors and did not behave politely or quietly
According to a lot of the Jewish students, they were.
I mean, no fucking shit.
That makes sense.
KTLA - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for KTLA:
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News