• federal_explorer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Signal refusing to federate with WhatsApp, even though meta says they will still use the signal protocol is the most bone headed decision I have ever seen from them.

    There no better chance to break the network effect than this.

  • Apollo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a good move; it shows they are no interested in popularity but Privacy and Security

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In a statement to the publication, Signal president Meredith Whittaker says, “Our privacy standards are extremely high and not only will we not lower them, we want to keep raising them. Currently, working with Facebook Messenger, iMessage, WhatsApp, or even a Matrix service would mean a deterioration of our data protection standards.”

    Ugh, okay Meredith, let’s pretend it’s impossible to handle this with user experience that makes the user acknowledge their conversation with a WhatsApp user is not secure. Meanwhile if the only viable way for this conversion to occur is to have WhatsApp on both ends, the situation less secure. So according to Meredith, the choice is between less overall security or not having conversations with people who don’t use Signal. That could makes sense for her salary but it surely is a net negative for Signal users some of which will have to install WhatsApp since they won’t be able to afford not to have those conversations.

    • zecg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ugh, okay Meredith, let’s pretend it’s impossible to handle this with user experience that makes the user acknowledge their conversation with a WhatsApp user is not secure. Meanwhile if the only viable way for this conversion to occur is to have WhatsApp on both ends, the situation less secure.

      I don’t agree with this. The only way to have the conversation is to have Signal at both ends.

      • ben_dover@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        while i see where you’re coming from, being able to message WhatsApp users from a client app that respects privacy would be better than being forced to have WhatsApp installed on your device, with it snooping casually on your everyday device usage and your contact list and so on.

        WhatsApp is the only Facebook app on my phone and i’d love to get rid of it without losing the ability to message all those buffons using it (which make up for 99% of my social circle)

        • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly. Let us choose if we want to interact with WhatsApp or not.

          I’d be ready to sacrifice some security in order to not have WhatsApp installed on my phone.

          Of course it would be cool to just get rid of WhatsApp but I can’t force my whole basketball team to go on Threema…

  • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Extremely bad take in my opinion. Not supporting alternatives means you force users into installing the alternatives

    • The Hobbyist@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      People could be using WhatsApp if they cared about it, but they chose signal for a reason. And making signal weaken its privacy for the purpose of reaching more people is against everything they stand for.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could try and run both

      Keep whatsapp, and slowly switch contacts to Signal (it might just be close friends and family). That’s what people around me are doing

      • Patch@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have both WhatsApp and Signal installed.

        In the 3 years or so since I installed Signal, I haven’t had a single conversation on it. Only a handful of people from my Contact book are showing as Signal users, and none of them people I speak to regularly.

        I live in anticipation of someone deciding to message me on there, but I’m not exactly optimistic at this point.

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I met one person a few months ago who also used signal primarily. It did feel weird adding someone normally. Usually when I add someone it’s their first time with signal

  • 1lya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Using Threema is not an option. This is paid software and it is too difficult to purchase a license for this software when Google does not allow us to pay for purchases through their Android app store. No one from my entourage will bother paying for a license for this software using cryptocurrency. They will just install another messenger.

    • 01011@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can buy a license directly from Threema via credit card, btc or cash in the mail.

      • 1lya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I know this. That’s why I wrote that it’s too difficult to deal with cryptocurrency payments on their website. Most people won’t do it. Other payment methods are not available from my country.