• 60fpsrefugee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah, ain’t no monetizing scheme is gonna save this one. There’s just too much bad rep.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      There’s just too much bad rep.

      On the one hand, that’s not a bet I’d take since No Man’s Sky exists.

      On the other hand, NMS is definitely the exception, not the rule.

      • ms.lane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        People wanted NMS, they wanted NMS to be good.

        It was a let down when it wasn’t.

        No one wanted this. No one thought it would be good.

        It was a laugh when it failed.

        They aren’t the same.

    • kaitco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, ain’t no monetizing scheme is gonna save this one.

      This is the key marketing fail. They released an OW clone, and then failed to highlight the differences. I might have thrown $40 at it, if I’d known that there wasn’t going to be a battlepass or something equally asinine to come with that price tag.

      I played through their free weekend beta some time in July and didn’t hate it, but it was clunky and the designs were uglier than OW. That said, I had expected them to clean it up before release; anything except let it stand with its overarching veneer of greyige+olive green over every character.

      I think they just released it to say it was released and be able to do the write-offs. Otherwise, any game that had been in development this long would have seen a huge marketing campaign that highlighted why players should abandon OW, et al for Concord instead.