• TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Okay, and you are not entitled to use the platform. How do you suppose people are to keep it running? Charity? Good luck with that. In the case of Youtube or Twitch, video streaming is more expensive than you can imagine.

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Requesting users play ads but giving them the content even if they don’t means it’s more like asking for a charitable donation than a transaction. They could paywall it but they don’t, and it’s not like there’s a competitor with the same content.

      Also, Google feel entitled to record your voice on your phone and send it to their servers. Do they think their users are a charity, or worse?

      • TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Youtube can’t paywall the site, since that would create an even bigger outrage than longer ads. But they are already working on unskippable ads, so people won’t be able to block them with conventional means. So to them, it’s not a simple request. Either you watch ads or you pay. I’m personally not a big fan of that, since it feels way too intrusive and dystopian.

        And yeah, Google as a whole sucks ass, we all know that. Again, I’m not arguing against stealing from them, but just that it IS indead still stealing/piracy to block ads. If you want to do that or not is a personal decision, but people still need to be aware of what they’re doing.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Google can make it more difficult but it’s like anti-cheat, a losing arms race. In the end users control if adverts play even if Google controls the computer as strictly as North Korea OS.

          Words do not have innate definitions and “piracy” can mean whatever you want (when not in a court of law). If people understand what you mean then no direct issue. Due to the association with stealing and murder on boats I won’t call copyright infringement “piracy” (thanks music industry propaganda) or when blocking adverts. If you insist on calling me a pirate I will respond with pirate talk, ye landlubber.

          • TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Arrr, matey! I think we have an understanding! Ye may sail the seven seas, I don’ see a thing wrong with it!