• Praise Idleness@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 months ago

    Their video about thumbnail A/B testing was quite interesting to see. Considering how they have dedicated designers to make these thumbnails I guess that works pretty well, despite your personal opinion on it, with which I agree too.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You have to understand shit like these thumbsnails arent made for people like you and me.

      They are made for the mindless horde of sub-intellectual gremlins who are incapable of rational, independent thought. The kind that run out and put sandpaper on their windshield wipers and microwave their phones to “fast recharge” them because they saw a video that said to do that.

      and the sad, terrifying reality, is these mentally stunted little goblins outnumber us by margins that are too terrifying to even think about.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Unfortunately this is just the way it is on YT now. Post clickbait thumbnails, or miss out on hundreds of thousands of views. Because that’s the way YT likes it. They don’t want to positively weight long-term high-quality content, they want to promote clickbait.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        If someone cares about their view count then you shouldn’t give their content your time of day

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Quite the opposite. If they didn’t care about the view count the content wouldn’t exist in the first place. No one makes content with the intention of no one watching it, and they certainly don’t make high quality content that requires a team of people and expensive equipment.

            • helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              At a bare minimum they make them because they’re passionate about sharing with others. In which case they care about the view count. Once again, no one makes a video and uploads it to a video-sharing platform and doesn’t care who watches it.

              Having the time and money to dedicate to making high quality content makes them higher quality. If they have to work a 9-5 doing something else, and they record everything on a Galaxy S4 because they have no money, it’s bound to be lower quality or just non-existent.

              • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                You need to spend more time around small channels

                LTT is a good example of how what you’re saying is bullshit. All the money in the world but they’re still tech illiterate people making tech videos

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Dude, this isn’t the Youtube of 2006 anymore.

              Content creating, whether for TV, Radio, or Internet is a job.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s the way that yields the longest combined watch time from the audience.

        Do they go back and change thumbnails after a while? LTT does focus on a lot of evergreen content as well.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s the way that yields the longest combined watch time from the audience.

          No, that would be rewarding creators with a long history of producing high quality content.

          • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            YouTube gives a b testing for YouTubers based on watch time, so they can tune their thumbnails to the one that gets the most watch time. The audience doesn’t always know the history of the chanel, they need to go off the thumbnail.

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      As part of the mindless horde of sub-intellectual gremlins, i have to say that while i dont love thumbnails like that, i still click on the video because i know it’ll be quality

        • Praise Idleness@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          People start yt channels for a lot of reason and probably the biggest reason is money. I don’t really understand your fixation over yt channels only being passion project.

          • thethirdobject@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            i understand even less when people are saying that when someone does something out of passion it should allow us to consume it for free

          • ours@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Especially with some channels being financially successful labors of love like Red Letter Media.