• RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    What are we monitoring? How kids get dressed, if they pick their nose while using the computer?

    Blocking sites does not require on device “monitoring”. Locking down a machine does not require monitoring. So why this invasive level of monitoring.

    • Deceptichum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s about monitoring what the children are using on the device not turning on the camera and spying on them naked.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        In America we’ve had several instances of undisclosed webcam monitoring of children via school issued devices.

        • Deceptichum
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          But that’s not what the article is talking about.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            i am sorry people are using critical thinking and common sense when dealing untrustworthy actors such as a school district and some shiti 3p vendor.

            if they peep on your kid, what is your gonna about it? cry to daddy police? 🤡

            i guess y’all must in live in a different country lol

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, that’s just weird. Either it’s a managed device and can be used only with what is pre configured… Or the invasion of privacy is the goal. Creeping on kids… I’m in your PC reading your dm’s…