• a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Why would I vote for a primary party candidate who supports ranked choice voting when I can just throw my vote away on a third-party candidate that will never be elected? I’ve got principles!”

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      Because apparently throwing your vote away will somehow convince politicians to move left or something, despite all the evidence that it won’t.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      Voting for either side is just accepting the status quo.

      Third party vote today is just laying ground work for a generational fight. There is no other way to get the attention from the politicians.

      They rule on behalf of donors and two party system ensures they ways win, they just take turns.

      • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        There is no other way to get the attention from the politicians.

        And if those politicians are so keen on ignoring you, why would they listen to this? Oh, you voted for Cornel West because you’re “unsatisfied,” literally who cares? The status quo wins again, goodbye. Say hello to the camps.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Say hello to the camps.

          is the new DNC FUD we get for voting third party?

          yes please put me into fema camp staffed by obama death panel, my DNC komissar 🤡

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I stated my position on this issue all over this thread.

              But for you here again dear:

              This tactic will only work if peasants are able to upset the regime sufficiently. a constant 3-5 percent every election, they will have to take notice. double digits they will have to start planning around it.

              This is a generational tactic, it will take several cycles to get the message across IF AND ONLY IF we can get 2-10% of voters of to go third choice every single election across all elections.

              This is a guerilla, asymmetric tactic. No doubt about it.

              But it very low cost from personal perspective but can be easily scaled if public sentiment turns.

              Once, we got the regime asking questions we can start getting proper 3p candidates in places. Or people can start now on them… but everybody can start denying the regime legitimacy today.

              • PaintedSnail@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                And what happens in the mean time? Third parties almost always take votes from the Democrats. (That is to say, most of the people who vote third party would have voted Democrat if the third party was not on the ballot.) This gives a huge advantage to the Republican party on close elections. The result is further entrenching of the party that has the larger vested interest in not reforming the system. As a result, any generational movement has no chance of succeeding because the party that directly opposes their goal is always in power.

                (To expand: since Democrats lose votes to third parties, they are the ones who would greatly benefit from any kind of ranked choice voting, so they tend to support such reforms. Since Republicans benefit more from FPTP, they tend to oppose such reforms.)

                It’s all well and good to send a message, but that message will be received by the people who benefit most by ignoring that message.

                The better method is to get people in power now who support election reform, get those reforms passed, then third party candidates become viable.

                • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  And what happens in the mean time?

                  The same thing that has been happening since at least the 80s. Quality of life will continue to slowly degrade, less natural child birth, more immigration, more work, less pay, higher taxes.

                  Your comment hinges on the idea that “if we just vote for democrats this one more time, they will finally reverted the course”

                  I don’t believe this position. I know most people still do. Hence why this is will be a generational change as more and more people become disenfranchised they will stop voting for either party. We are already partially here but the regime got away because nobody cares about low voter turn outs.

                  I am shilling fuck NOT VOTING, VOTE AGAINST THESE PARASITES.

                  If you are a dedicated Democrat, then vote Democrat. That’s how voting works, everybody gets a their vote and they can do with it as they please.

                  I don’t understand how “I am taking away votes from Democrats”

                  Why would I care? These people are not my friend, family or “team”

                  Together with Republicans, the Democrats are the regime the elites use to oppress working people. Why would I engage with a bad faith actor?

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ranked choice voting seems like a great way to create huge political instability. Let’s take the system that has worked decent for 248 years and completely replace it with something less well tested. We already have uncertainty we don’t need to mess with the system more.

      • Acamon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        You don’t want to mess about with that democracy nonsense. We’ve had a monarchy that has worked decent for a millennium, and you want it replace it with some untested, newfangled system?