• JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Are they generating more power than they are spending by making the train go? Has Barcelona mastered perpetual motion??

    It’s good thing, sure, but it’s no savior. The blurb makes it sound like it’s a net gain of energy, and that’s impossible. It’s not free energy. It’s just upcycled waste.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I don’t read it as magical energy created out of nothing, but I do read it as “free” energy that would exist whether this regeneration system is used or not, that would otherwise be lost as heat.

      With or without regenerative braking, the train system is still going to accelerate stopped trains up to operational speed, then slow them down to a stop, at regular intervals throughout the whole train system. Tapping into that existing energy is basically free energy at that point.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Only because of the speed of the train. Fuel spent accelerating to later brake is wasted fuel. More efficient would be spending only enough fuel to come to a full stop without braking.

        • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          Efficient from an electrical standpoint, but not a transportation one. You can’t “improve” it so much that it no longer does the thing it’s supposed to do.

        • olympicyes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          So you want the trains to coast from station to station? Do you really believe that or is it very important for you to be right?