db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 20 days agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square27linkfedilinkarrow-up176cross-posted to: politicalmemes@scribe.disroot.org
arrow-up176imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 20 days agomessage-square27linkfedilinkcross-posted to: politicalmemes@scribe.disroot.org
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up12·19 days agoAccelerationism is a religion.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·19 days agothis isn’t about accelerationism
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up8·19 days agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·18 days ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-218 days agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
minus-squarefubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·19 days agoI find this sentence very funny
it’s a fact, not dogma
Accelerationism is a religion.
this isn’t about accelerationism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
you’re making that up
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
I find this sentence very funny