The latest measure to clamp down on mass tourism in the city.

  • megrania@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really wish Barcelona would follow this example … it’s not that hard to stay clear of the tourists if you avoid the Ramblas, but the pollution spreads through the air and it really does some damage. Supposedly it’s not even like this type of tourism brings in a lot of money …

  • kindenough@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, I am from Amsterdam, left 20 years ago and can’t recognize the city I left then. It is overrun with entitled tourist and braindead drunk Brits. Glad I live in the country side of the Netherlands now.

  • AllahFucksKids@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t checked, but I bet you can still dock yachts and fly private jets. This is doing far too little far too late, and blaming the wrong people while doing it.

  • steven@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I do think the problem tourists causing nuisance for the residents are not the ones arriving via cruise ship. Are they also going to close the airport because it doesn’t fit the climate ambitions?

    • Wirrvogel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For Venice who also banns cruise ships:

      As passengers tend to eat and sleep on the ship, they contribute relatively little to the historic city’s economy while weighing heavily on its infrastructure and resources.

      Along with daytrippers, cruise passengers have been dubbed ‘hit and run’ tourists. “It’s not the type of tourism we want for the city,” tourism councillor Simone Venturini said after the cruise ship ban was announced.

      ‘Hit and run’ tourists represent around 73 per cent of visitors to Venice, but they only contribute to 18 per cent of the tourism economy (those who stay at least one night in a hotel are responsible for nearly 50 per cent).

  • hardypart@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fair. I can understand both the appeal of cruising from city to city on a swimming hotel and the hate from these cities against the ever repeating sudden influx of thousands of tourists with each cruise ship.

    • Singar@citizensgaming.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean… It’s probably the laziest form of traveling and contributes the most pollution. I would have no bad feelings against it being banned by more countries.

    • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      the problem ist that cruise lines advertise it as a great influx of money dor the cities, but often they don’t spend that much, as food and stuff is already on the ship. Meanwhile the pollution and influx drives land based tourists away.

    • MBM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t get cruises, whenever you get somewhere it’s always crowded and you don’t have enough freedom to actually experience any place