The government says it wants to mitigate the "harm" social media is inflicting on children.

There will be no exemptions on the age limit for children who have consent from their parents. The government says that the onus will be on social media platforms to show they are taking reasonable steps to prevent access.

Albanese said there would be no penalties for users, and that it would be up to Australia’s online regulator - the eSafety Commissioner - to enforce the laws.

  • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
    5·
    12 hours ago

    This is one of those things where I think lots of us have this preconceived idea in our heads that social media can’t be good for kids, like… to me, it can be really depressing and isolating, and a really negative place to be.

    But it absolutely has its benefits as well. I have learned so much from interacting with people different from myself. Honestly, I think that if it wasn’t for social media, I wouldn’t be anywhere near as compassionate and empathetic as I am today - or at least, as I try to be.

    The research into how social media affects young people does not, in my opinion, justify any sort of restriction or ban. Yes, there are kids for whom social media is a really negative experience, but there are also lots of kids for whom it is a vital lifeline.

    As a queer person, growing up in the early internet age actually gave me hope that there was some place in this world for me, and that I could love and be loved. If I didn’t have that, I cannot imagine that my mental health would have been good.

    I think, if anything, there should be restrictions placed on algorithmic curation, because that’s where social media is doing the harm really.

    So for those reasons, I am absolutely opposed to nationwide blanket bans on social media. Kids have rights too, and we should not unnecessarily restrict their liberty, even if we are acting in their best interests.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    6·
    14 hours ago

    Laughs in nostr and fediverse. Because it will totally be enforced in these places. I’m absolutely certain of it. /s

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.eeEnglish
    5·
    15 hours ago

    Free speech and protection from censorship is the most important right to ensure democracy. Any erosion of that right is both bad in itself, as adolescents are kept in their real life bubble and not exposed to other viewpoints online - which was crucial for me personally - but it also paves the way for further erosion of that right. They’ll keep pushing the age up and banning more information.

    • boreengreen@lemm.ee
      2·
      12 hours ago

      And they will have a machanism in place to deanonymize you, to check your age. That will be abused.

  • rabber@lemmy.caEnglish
    7·
    16 hours ago

    Albanese said there would be no penalties for users, and that it would be up to Australia’s online regulator - the eSafety Commissioner - to enforce the laws.

    So how likely will this really be enforced? Any bogans weigh in?

    • BogusCabbage@lemmy.world
      3·
      16 hours ago

      Likely just a “Are you 16 or older?” Check mark and that is it. Any site willing to show ✨ The Internet ✨ in all its glory really don’t care enough to actually require anything more, also doubt they’ll enforce any site over seas, probably a few headlines that they’re sueing sites like IG, TikTok, etc but it’ll be such and insignificant amount it’ll just be another cost of operation to the companies.