Look, you can’t complain about this after giving us so many scenarios involving N locked chests and M unlabeled keys.

https://explainxkcd.com/3015/

  • okamiueru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    I have never played R&D D&D (or, I did once, but had a bad experience), so bear with me.

    Is it ever allowed to simply do the thing, instead of rolling dice? For example in this case, to place 5+5 tokens upside down, and pick two of them? Or fold pieces of paper, etc?

    Edit: I meant D&D of course. Don’t know where the R came from.

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 days ago

      Absolutely!

      The rules are a base framework for the DM to build upon.

      Also the scenario in the comic isn’t actual DnD it’s really a math problem phrased in a DnD setting using standard DnD dice. In a real game the DM would probably do something like what you described.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      The dm can make up whatever rules they want! That’s the great thing about it. I’ve never heard of anyone doing that, but in this case it sounds like a great idea to simplify the whole thing.

      Edit: that’s also the terrible thing about it and if you have a bad DM they can make you miserable. That could be why you had a bad experience?

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      Dices are only used if there is a fail condition.

      Folding a paper doesn’t have one.

      Folding an crane for an origami competition does.

    • mormund@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      You play the game with humans, you are “allowed” to do what ever you want and doesn’t annoy the others. I like your idea with the tokens.

    • BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      I’d absolutely allow something like that at my table. Something like this isn’t going to have explicit rules, so even in a serious RAW (Rules As Written) game, the GM is going to have to come up with something. It’s just that we all have dice and may not have the right setup for tokens, etc.

      Really, the simple way to do it is have arrows #1-5 be the cursed ones. The player then rolls a D10 to see which ones are pulled, rerolling on repeat “arrows”.

      • wunami@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        You have less arrows to pull from on subsequent rolls. You can’t keep using a D10.

          • deur@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            Now someone has to do the math on how many rolls on average it will take to resolve the action given the chance of rerolls.