• Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    16 days ago

    Including auto parts made in Canada and shipped to the US to be installed on made-in-America cars.

  • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    17 days ago

    call me a conspiracy theorist however much you want. I still believe that he and his friends such as elon musk will purposefully crash the american economy to be able to purchase stocks at a lower price

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      16 days ago

      Absolutely, however it’s done, Canada needs to reduce its trade dependency on the USA.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        The biggest impediment to increasing trade with countries that aren’t 50km away is the cost and logistics of shipping.

        Given their proximity, the US is always going to be looked at as the easiest place to trade with.

        Of course, having a chaotic baboon running the place does change that calculation somewhat, but the fact that they’re just “across the stereet” still tilts that balance.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      Seriously, we should be getting in with them really hard right now. It’s the only hope if we want to stay relevant as a sovereign nation in any way.

  • voluble@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    16 days ago

    The news also prompted a flurry of late-evening phone calls: between Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Trump, and between Trudeau and several provincial premiers, in an effort to defuse the danger to Canada’s economy.

    “It was a good discussion and they will stay in touch,” a Canadian official said of the Trudeau-Trump call. The prime minister also spoke with the premiers of Ontario and Quebec.

    I wish the other problems facing citizens of Canada were treated with this same kind of urgency from the federal government.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 days ago

      I wish the other problems facing citizens of Canada… Federal government

      Day to day problems are rarely handled by the federal government.

      You’d need to ask your provincial and municipal governments why they aren’t moving with urgency to help Canadians.

      While you’re at it, ask Doug Ford why he hates the people of Ontario.

      • voluble@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 days ago

        I’m not sure I understand your point. I’m talking about things like housing and affordability, which affect people across the country. These things could be handled more proactively on the federal level, and with coordination between GoC and the provinces. A $250 cheque and a gst holiday in advance of an election is bread and circuses. There are real issues that the nation is far behind on. The current government has done a bad job with these. They’ve lacked the ability or will to even identify housing and affordability as matters for intervention.

        Sorry, I just can’t agree with anyone who thinks the current federal government has done all they could do to address these issues. The whole notion of “that’s not the job of the federal government”, it’s mealymouthed, and I don’t think it’s an acceptable position.

        • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          16 days ago

          I’m talking about things like housing and affordability, which affect people across the country.

          Housing is not the responsibility of the federal government. Any support they offer would need to be handled by Provincial leadership and municipalities.

          As for “affordability”… that’s a very broad term. Are you referring to anything in particular?

          The issue with blaming the feds, is that the feds can only do as much as the other governments (provincial and municipal) are willing to do.

          In Ontario, for example, we have a crisis in education, healthcare, public safety, poverty, and crime.

          These are issues that affect nearly all Ontarians on a daily basis, yet our government wants to waste money, and people want to blame Trudeau.

          Our Provincial Government should be primarily focused on those concerns, but they’d rather misspend tens of millions to remove safe cycling infrastructure from the City of Toronto.

          And you should also keep in mind that we have a minority Federal Government, so other parties, including those known to NOT CARE about people, are creating consistent roadblocks to progress in areas where the Feds have influence.

          • Someone@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            Isn’t that the whole point of a “Team Canada approach”? All the provinces have their own needs and abilities, but we need some sort of coordination to make sure we’re all aiming for the same goal. And while housing may not directly be their responsibility the feds should be there for the assist with whatever the provinces need but can’t do themselves.

            • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 days ago

              And while housing may not directly be their responsibility the feds should be there for the assist with whatever the provinces need but can’t do themselves.

              What I’ve observed is that the feds can give provinces all the money they like, but if the provinces are misspending or not spending those funds, you see no results.

              This happened in Ontario during the pandemic. The Ford government underspent in healthcare while doctors and nurses begged for relief. It cost their lives, and the quality of our healthcare to drop significantly.

              At the same time, this government has $48 million to remove bike lanes from Toronto, and apparently billions to build an underground tunnel for cars under the 401.

              The feds can only do so much when provinces are incapable of producing effective leadership.

          • voluble@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            Housing is not the responsibility of the federal government. Any support they offer would need to be handled by Provincial leadership and municipalities.

            Better tax breaks and incentives for first time buyers, higher restrictions on foreign and corporate ownership of single family homes. Etc. There are plenty of things a motivated federal government could do. This government isn’t motivated to address the housing issue.

            As for “affordability”… that’s a very broad term. Are you referring to anything in particular?

            Something over and above the toothless grocery code of conduct, which hasn’t even been agreed upon? Lower tax rates on earnings for people near and below a living wage, which itself is indexed to inflation.

            And you should also keep in mind that we have a minority Federal Government

            Not while the Liberals held a majority from 2015-2019, and not during the supply and confidence agreement from 2021-2024. It’s incorrect to argue that the Liberals have been hamstrung by a minority Parliament. They could have accomplished anything they wanted to.

            We should demand more from our federal government. The Liberals have been bad, and I don’t understand the view that they’ve done well under the circumstances. They haven’t. I read your comment as apologism for the Liberals, and I genuinely don’t understand that position.

            • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              16 days ago

              I don’t disagree that a lot of the Liberal actions have been milquetoast… but they have at some point implemented the things you asked for, for what parts of housing that is in their purview:

              Banned foreign homebuyers in 2022 and extended it to 2027

              Doubled the tax credit in 2021 and added a ‘flipping’ tax

              Added the ability to get into 30 year mortgages (good and bad, but it is something that would make payments easier)

              They’ve done the things you were looking for (I don’t think perfectly at all, mind you), yet within the provinces, only the BCNDP govt. has taken any independent leadership on their part of addressing the housing crisis. Ford has only gotten in the way, and a handful of municipalities have taken action, such as in Edmonton. Yet, people at large and especially Premiers are all pointing the finger at Trudeau for problems instead of thinking how to help.

            • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              16 days ago

              Better tax breaks and incentives for first time buyers

              The feds doubled first time home buyer’s tax credit (2022), set up a “first home savings account” (2023), offers a home buyer’s plan, and some provinces offer their own rebates.

              And as a reminder, even when the feds offer tax breaks to help people, Provinces bitch and complain, like with the recent announcement of a tax-break on certain consumer goods.

              higher restrictions on foreign and corporate ownership of single family homes. Etc.

              The feds announced an extension on bans on foreign ownership of Canadian housing.

              Lower tax rates on earnings for people near and below a living wage, which itself is indexed to inflation.

              There are a LOT of tax credits, rebates, and support for low-income individuals and families. Sure, we can always do more, but the feds have not stopped announcing new programs and extending existing ones.

              Not while the Liberals held a majority from 2015-2019

              Was affordability and housing prices a major problem back then? I don’t seem to recall any of the same ongoing reports of people struggling back then.

              Things like minimum wage are set by Provinces and territories. Only federal employees are impacted by the federal government’s minimum wages.

              We should demand more from our federal government. The Liberals have been bad, and I don’t understand the view that they’ve done well under the circumstances. They haven’t. I read your comment as apologism for the Liberals, and I genuinely don’t understand that position.

              Yes, we should always demand more. No doubt.

              But it seems like the things you’re asking for are already in place, and/or are the responsibility of the Provincial government.

              • voluble@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 days ago

                Yes, this is what I’m saying. The federal government can do things to address these issues. I’m not a policymaker, I’m just some jackass sitting at a computer. A government with vision could make strides.

                And to my initial point, a government that could build political bridges with the provinces would be even more effective.

        • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          Bang on. They’re all culpable and doing nothing to address the underlying problem because they all know the solution bites the hand that feeds them (those with money).

          As a good example we all witnessed over the last year + constant initiatives by all governments to free up capital to ease the building of housing. Outside of the government what private company is going to not want to maximize their profit when building housing? Rental units and low income housing will never be prioritized. Hell starter homes will never be prioritized there’s no money in them.

          Every opportunity for any level of government that is flush with land to say “we will build housing” like they did decades ago. Of course that would require real leadership and we all know that’s not what is on the menu in politics anymore.

  • RandAlThor@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    On the other hand, I’d love to see a short trade war, because it hits Trump-loving provinces the hardest. Let leopards eat their faces.

    • voluble@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 days ago

      I think it’s cruel to wish ill fate on a fellow Canadian. Please consider that no province in this country, from east to west, is a monoculture, politically speaking. I say this as an Albertan.

      • RandAlThor@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        16 days ago

        Oh this isn’t ill will. It’s good for them. Some lessons are hard. Hopefully Trump will give them some self-realization that they are not American but Trump’s enemies.

      • Infomatics90@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        I understand the sentiment people might have towards the western provinces, but i personally don’t think its nice to paint the whole group with a broad stroke. I know good people in alberta.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Which provinces do you think would not get hurt by this, or even not as much? BC is the only one that might get away okay that I can think of, and I’m not even sure about that.

      • RandAlThor@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 days ago

        Trust me, I know EVERYONE will get hurt by a trade war because each province trade with the US more than with each other. But one in particular will be brought to its knees.

          • RandAlThor@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            16 days ago

            Oil and gas products were the single biggest export item to the US at US$128.5b in 2023. The next biggest category was vehicles at US$58b.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              16 days ago

              Oil can, at some additional price, be redirected, though. A specific part for an American automobile, on the other hand…

              Then again, Ontario is just as conservative lately, and has always been more American, so if it’s revenge against the right you’re after maybe that works.

              • RandAlThor@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                16 days ago

                No. Oil and gas are very hard to ship. Canadian oil is of heavy type which most of the world doesn’t use. Gas needs LNG terminals and we simply haven’t built. EU has been urging Canada to build some in Quebec and Maritimes so they can reduce dependence on Russia. Most of the pipelines go to the US south for refining - in Louisiana and Texas. Canadian producers have no choice but to sell to them, at whatever they want to pay. That’s why Alberta was bitching and moaning about building the pipeline to BC so that they can get a better price for their heavy oil elsewhere and Trudeau spent billions to appease them but that pipeline’s been in limbo.

                • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  16 days ago

                  Tank trucks exist, they’re just more expensive, which is why pipelines have been on the agenda. We also have upgraders that make heavy oil light - I’ve seen some desulfering plants in person (yes, I’m in this picture, if only geographically). It’s a distillation away from being petrol (and heavy/heating oil and asphalt), and the main cost of shipping is petrol, so the economic case is really just driven by the need for it at the other end.

                  Meanwhile, in Ontario a part crosses the border multiple times on it’s way to being generally saleable as a car, and would rack up 25% every time as the policy is currently proposed. You’re right, Alberta will be in the shitter economically, but we’re not the most vulnerable, let alone the most vulnerable by far.

  • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Buy next to nothing. Fuck this god damned country. No holiday gift giving…just cook a meal and invite people over for music and conversation. Maybe play cards together.

    Edit: Just realized I was in a Canada sublemmy. My humblest apologies. You fine people do as you wish, but us curs in your filthy subbasement need to resist the shit out of this festering jejunal carbuncle’s self-imposed monarchy.

  • RandAlThor@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    On the one hand this is threatening and scary. On the other hand, this is Trump’s way of declaring opening position on a new trade agreement. He’s scrapping the old one he made.

    • Someone@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 days ago

      Why would we waste time with a new agreement in the next 4 years when it won’t be worth the paper it’s printed on?

    • MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 days ago

      I don’t get why more people don’t understand this. He’s just setting the tone for negotiations. He’s playing hardball, even with his closest allies…

      • DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        He’s doing what his Russian oligarch owners are paying him to do.

        He’s literally getting money from Russian oligarchs who are controlled by Putin.

        I don’t get why more people don’t understand this.

        He’s not negotiating, he’s helping to destroy the country from within for his own personal gain.

        https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA

        This has been the plan since Russia started losing the Cold War. Trump was the first time a Russian asset reached the presidency.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 days ago

        Anyone who has been paying attention understands that trumps idea of negotiation is to get everything and give nothing.

        He doesn’t operate on the idea of mutually beneficial outcomes. The only way he understands him winning is to make everyone else lose.