ok. if we go into ubuntu 24.04 settings, we can see that the function switches are on rectangles (like in the picture). how can we recreate this in python? (I need the same rectangle on which I can put everything).
And you’re solving this by getting angry at the person trying to help you?
Learning is a process that you engage in. It’s not a thing that’s done to you. You can’t learn anything if you’re not willing to be a productive part of that process.
I get that you’re frustrated. Learning is often frustrating. But you’re only going to magnify your frustration by turning it on other people.
“Angry” was the charitable read. Your conveyed tone, intentional or not, was that of someone who was either talking down to their interlocutor, or frustrated that they felt they weren’t being understood. I picked “angry” because if your intention was to talk down to me, that comes off so much worse for you.
Regardless, my previous point stands. I have asked a number of questions that you have answered in only the most minimal fashion possible. That is not the bahaviour of someone who is genuinely trying to engage in a learning process. You’re not actually making the effort, presumably because you want me to make it all for you, for free. That’s a pretty shitty way to behave, and it’s a bad way to get help with anything.
ok. if we go into ubuntu 24.04 settings, we can see that the function switches are on rectangles (like in the picture). how can we recreate this in python? (I need the same rectangle on which I can put everything).
It sounds to me like you need to read through the PyGObject tutorials. If you’ve already read those, maybe try telling us exactly where you got stuck.
i. cant. find. how. to. do. rectangle. in. tutorials.
And you’re solving this by getting angry at the person trying to help you?
Learning is a process that you engage in. It’s not a thing that’s done to you. You can’t learn anything if you’re not willing to be a productive part of that process.
I get that you’re frustrated. Learning is often frustrating. But you’re only going to magnify your frustration by turning it on other people.
but… i’m not angry…
“Angry” was the charitable read. Your conveyed tone, intentional or not, was that of someone who was either talking down to their interlocutor, or frustrated that they felt they weren’t being understood. I picked “angry” because if your intention was to talk down to me, that comes off so much worse for you.
Regardless, my previous point stands. I have asked a number of questions that you have answered in only the most minimal fashion possible. That is not the bahaviour of someone who is genuinely trying to engage in a learning process. You’re not actually making the effort, presumably because you want me to make it all for you, for free. That’s a pretty shitty way to behave, and it’s a bad way to get help with anything.