Sorry I am finding it very difficult to follow your argument.
Can you explain what “international law” you believe US sanctions to have broken?
Sorry I am finding it very difficult to follow your argument.
Can you explain what “international law” you believe US sanctions to have broken?
That they can issue court orders to companies that do business in their territory?
They … they know…
That’s how it normally works, yes… particularly if the country in question is not a signatory to the ‘international law’ in question.
I’m saddened to hear that there are still an appreciable amount of Spanish people talking about us that way, but I’m not upset at the dictionary for recording the way the language is used.
I’m guessing it’s approached in something of a similar way to how English language dictionaries handle the word gyp, which is to give its definition and note that it is offensive.
your arguing US law. I’m arguing international. They are not the same.
No shit… these companies operate in the US, which makes US law applicable to them.
I mean, if folks were making fun of their housing I’d agree but this is the equipment they’re buying to threaten their neighbors with, instead of feeding their starving population
It takes all of three minutes to click through to the court order here. All three companies do significant business in the US, but the money to buy the oil was US dollars, and came from Oaktree Capital which is based in Los Angeles.
Which is (and this might be a shocker) in the USA.
Another country? What are you talking about my dude? An American company bought oil from Iran (in violation of US law), and had the oil they bought seized.
The government served them a court order, they turned the ship around and handed it over. No US naval involvement, etc.
Yeah probably Ukraine though, he’s a legitimate military target within their operational range and currently was not on putins shit list
Fucking ballsy to just be hanging out 300 yards from the border of a country you’re at war with like, “This lawn ain’t gonna mow itself!”
An explodlin’
Pretty sure this was Ukraine. Hard to keep track, it’s dangerous to work for Putin
I listed them in another comment in reply to the question… i wasn’t even including the Lisbon protocol, wild.
Yes of course… Russia acknowledged Ukraine’s borders and territorial integrity when:
Ukraine was admitted to the UN in 1945 with its current borders (which Russia could have vetoed).
Ukraine’s sovereign status and territorial integrity were guaranteed in the Belovezha Accords in 1991, which recognized the dissolution of the USSR and the borders and sovereignty of the former member states.
Ukraine agreed to transfer control of its 4,700 nuclear weapons to the Russian Federation in exchange for guarantees by the US, UK, and Russian Federation that they would not threaten to use (or use) military force against Ukraine… in the Budapest Memorandum in 1996.
Russia specifically recognized Ukraine’s sovereignty in Crimea when Ukraine agreed to lease it military bases there (and split the Black Sea fleet, stationed in Crimea, 50/50 in 1997) in the Partition Treaty.
The two countries agreed not to declare war on one another, to treat each other’s territory as inviolable and to prohibit the use of military force to resolve any future territorial disputes in the same year’s Treaty of Friendship.
Russia agreed to “final borders” in January 2003 (which include Crimea, Kherson, etc)
As you know, Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014; they signed a ceasefire in 2015 once again confirming Ukraine’s territorial integrity, but this was almost immediately violated, so I’m not sure I’d even count it.
Hope it helps. The three that were top of mind for me were 1991, 1996, and 2003.
I mean… I can’t see any issue with NATO not stopping Ukraine from invading its own territory… the territory the UN recognizes as part of Ukraine… and which Russia signed three separate treaties promising to respect as part of Ukraine.
Because the only source for that (at present) is the Wagner Group, who have a (dead) dog in the fight and are not bastions of truth. NYT will be trying to confirm it before saying so.
His officers thought his odds weren’t good and wouldn’t back him, is the word on the street. Top guy gets killed, not levels 2/3
Hate to say it but geopolitical, America’s got a brighter future than just about anyone else in the world right now. Something to say for lots of reserves of your own resources, your own continent containing only healthy, friendly trade allies and demography that isn’t in the midst of collapse.
Knowing America we’ll burn the place down to spite ourselves, but hey
Bro I’ve been on roundabouts less circular than your logic