I’m sorry Dave, but I’m afraid I can’t do that, because I don’t recognize your face.
I’m sorry Dave, but I’m afraid I can’t do that, because I don’t recognize your face.
Teenwolf.
Caddyshack. Happy Gilmore a close second.
Bend it Like Beckham, or Victory.
Edit: Bad News Bears or Major League.
Seems like people don’t know their Sting like they used to.
I was going to just ask, “Why?!” but I think you summed it up pretty well.
I’ve sort of been forced over to Mac (not that it’s a bad thing, just a thing), and Paint.NET is perhaps my biggest loss in that transition. I’ve loved that program since its early days, and is always one of my first installs on any new Windows installation.
Unless my math is wrong, early September is only roughly 8 months from New Year’s, not 9.
I was thinking more like an Ivy League graduate from a Lawyering the Dark Arts School of Deceptive Loopholes and Twisting, but I see your point.
Edit: added a word
I use this as well. I haven’t had any issues.
“I will accept no contrary advice from my councilors, nor advisors, nor my people!” said no non-megalomaniac ever.
Wow. It’s been a long time since I’ve heard that one.
I mentioned the not reading the article so people would not waste their time citing facts from the article that may explain the headline that suggested billions social security numbers were leaked. I made no assumptions about missing addresses, as the headline didn’t mention anything about missing addresses. I even mentioned that the event the article discussed was probably pretty bad – definitely not a negative against the article’s believability. I’m only guilty of judging a book by its cover, and in an existence of limited time, nobody has time to do any more than that except for limited exceptions. I did not choose to make this article an exception. The headline was mathematically deceptive, and my comment was about that. Nothing more.
If you see an article highlighting a breach of social security numbers and don’t assume it’s about the U.S., that’s crazy to me.
Like I said, I didn’t read the article, but only Americans would have social security numbers.
It sounds like a bad breach, and I’m not arguing against that. I just want to point out my doubts that there were ever 2.9 billion Americans since the founding of the nation, let alone since social security numbers became a thing. Maybe if I bothered to read the article, it would make more sense.
But totally not stranded… -NASA, probably
With fees that high, what was your typical profit margin per sale? How were you able to source product at such a high discount?
I’m not entirely familiar with how contempt of court works. Wouldn’t this be grounds for the bench to issue contempt charges?
I’m not familiar with this. Can you give a “for example?”
And this time IDF didn’t shoot them!
This is my mantra. Maintainability is king. I can’t convince anyone designing our systems that this is more important than fancy 3rd party libraries that add some capability that only a couple of people will ever understand how to use, but will find it’s way throughout the codebase and be a thorn in the side of bug fixes and new features for years.