Safety can not be one of those reasons, so why did it get longer now?

Neil deGrasse Tyson has no business next to the other 2.

2 replies pretty much in opposition to each other. So which one is correct? One says Arachne might be the cause, the other says to use that to fix the issue.

Hahaha, thank you.

Could you condense the key points in 5 sentences?

How about you tell ME everything about that beam?

It is the optimal way. Lowest effort, fastest, same result, no additional stuff needed.

What?

Because of the mentioned surveillance capitalism, there always has been surveillance, especially in any authoritarian regime and similar.

Rotten wood in some sort of wooden structure, probably load carrying.

But you get all of that in Germany…?

You can also buy a used PC or laptop or CPU/GPU/…, buying them new when you want good performance for value is nonsense.

There is a clear difference between such paranoia and actual surveillance. Not to mention that socialism etc. have/had a fucking ton of it, no idea why you bring capitalism up.

Okay, but the question remains about what he drinks elsewhere.

I thought the whole action was a well kept secret and that was the reason they were so successful? In any case, to me it is not easy to say he was or was not (morally) innocent. It is a complex topic and I have not even nearly enough info.

One call would have saved so many people. That is what I am trying to say.

Then what is he drinking outside of Germany if water is not what he actually wanted? That does not add up.

If he was zero involved with doing anything, do we say a journalist has no responsibility to save lives and really only document?

If the previous owner specifically make sure they do not know about that because they made a quick cash grab, how exactly do you imagine they should know about this?

What about any sort of juice? Lemonade?