• 0 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 28th, 2023

help-circle
  • I don’t know why you would not lisen to a source that checked it directly rather than a third party.

    But sure, it will be very easier to speak objectively on some facts like the one you quoted, bypassing the need for the actual source of information.

    So for speaking ethics for exemple i completely agree.

    For buying the game though (that was my premise), i think it has it’s limits. There is some informations that can be more subject to interpretation. Personally, those informations are often very relevant too.




  • What? You don’t have to play yourself, just lisen only to those who played and not everyone, and don’t share opinion without playing.

    Plain and simple, the difference is you can’t trust people not to talk out of their ass or not to distort informations without biases.

    I don’t trust myself to have a good opinion if i didn’t play, and even if i did i’m still biased. No one should lisen to one individual.

    Best way to know if a game is good is to look at the overall reception. Because if everyone is pointing out a qualitiy or flaw, it must hold some truth.

    Although the best way to see if you will like it is to look at gameplay. (That or you know exactly what you’re looking for…)


  • Voicemeeter did that too.

    But honestly i don’t really see what’s wrong. There’s a base donation for the price of the software but it just give the option to support the dev if you want…

    I mean most things that rely on donation like that are just cheap indie software (I think voicemeeter was $5)

    I’d take that over the awful and greedy subscriptions that cost an arm like adobe or Microsoft.


  • Funkytom467@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlEverytime
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I do agree on your emphasis on solidarity, but in a different way.

    I think we see this interweaving especially in movements and realistic actions. Because people have values that connect the two together, as well as connecting us. Solidarity is such a value, as well as equality.

    But, technically i think the world isn’t very restrictive on what ideas can work together. Technically we can have socialism with racism or sexism, it’s just a less common point of view in our cultures. And same for a capitalism that’s not discriminatory, that’s might be harder to achieve but it’s a real stance, based on other values…

    I think the main problem for leftist in general is that we must also learn to accept some differences in our point of views. Even being able to fight with people that doesn’t share said values.

    That’s the solidarity we lack the most, with differences regarding our opinions.

    I think that’s what get rid of this what’s “first” idea, as well as having multiple fights, all more powerful and with less hollow debates.

    Rarer and rarer are the movement that do that correctly in my opinion. We form communities based on our strong values which is great.

    But capitalists or politicians thrive on this drawback of having strong values. They use it to pit us against each other. Inside the left, and also by radicalization of both left and right ideologies. Though media like internet especially.


  • Funkytom467@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlEverytime
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mostly think one facilitates the other. Helping the poor helps in the sens they can then fight discrimination more effectively.

    And that’s why we could think we should start by solving the more recent problem of classes first.

    To be honest the lines between the two fights probably blurs to thoses who wants both because they value equality first right?

    But it’s also true that it doesn’t apply that well to everything completely. Abortion is indeed a very good example.