I mean murdering people is extremist.

Taking their money would achieve the same.

His actions are a pretty big indicator but not 100% true.

If you struggle to visualise, just focus on your breathing. When you notice you are distracted bring it back to your breathing. Acknowledge where your mind drifted but try not to dwell on it as you focus back.

There are also apps available to help with breathing exercises. I had one that showed a balloon inflating and deflating. I found it easier to focus on that at first.

Counting while you box breath can also make it easier. The count can be whatever you’re comfortable with. 5 5 5 5 works well for me.

Nah he’s just bullshitting to his base. This isn’t a mental health crisis or anything. Just grifting.

Yeah the people of Gaza don’t want to die either. Israel would have 100% destroyed all their homes and moved in by now otherwise.

This is why it’s such a complicated situation. Everyone at the top is a complete piece of shit and it’s the civilians on both sides that pay the price.

No one is saying defend the terrorists. They are saying accurately report the genocide that is being waged against the civilians.

Half the population is too young to vote. So you can’t say they brought it on themselves.

But then they’ll only refuse in areas they think they’ll lose.

Most of the time yeah. But it depends as you can write c# with very little GC use if you avoid allocations.

Ahead of time compiling also gets things much closer. But then you lose runtime optimization.

Actually jit languages can outperform compiled languages by using runtime analysis to perform tiered compilation and profile guided optimisations.

C# has made some great strides in this regard.

All the normal optimisations are applied when it is compiled to byte code. Like loop unrolling etc.

Then once it detects the hot paths during execution it can apply even more based on how it is called. It can also do optimisations that aren’t possible at initial compile time.

Dynamic PGO it’s called. It’s a really interesting topic.

Money. Sone people will look past almost anything if they think it’ll make them richer.

And that’s a privilege not everyone has.

And tbh most cis people wouldn’t enjoy being misgendered either.

I’m fairly sure use after free isn’t possible unless you explicitly use unsafe code right?

It’s compiler enforced is the point.

That sounds like a comment written by somebody who has no idea what the article says

The numbers put out by Ukraine have been 1000+ consistently for quite a while now.

I love things like this.

There was a set of brick stairs leading up into a giant hedge full of brambles in my hometown. Straight from the pavement up and you couldn’t see the end.

Fascinated us as kids.

I bet you plenty of people absolutely do want this.

Most people can barely use a computer and would love this if it worked well.

You forget a huge percentage of users can barely access their emails.

Lemmy is very techcentric and most users on here are far from the average consumer on technical literacy.

You just aren’t the target audience.

It’s amazingly good at moderating user content to flag for moderator review. Existing text analysis completely falls down beyond keyword filtering tbh.

It’s really good at sentiment analysis. Which is great for things like user reviews. The Amazon ai notes on products are actually brilliant at summarizing the pros and cons of a product. I work for a holiday let company and we experimented with using it to find customers we need to follow up with and the results were amazing.

It smashes other automated translating services as well.

I use it a lot as a programmer to very quickly learn new topics. Also as an interactive docs that you can ask follow up questions to. I can pick up a new language as I go much faster than with traditional resources.

It’s honestly a complete game changer.

I’m guessing they have limited resources for direct intervention so use this to flag up people who have the most risk factors.

It doesn’t sound like this is people asking for help but more trying to predict who might need it.

after an investigation by The Fuller Project and The Markup found the department’s algorithm prioritized White, male veterans. It also gave preference to veterans who are “divorced and male” and “widowed and male” but not to any group of female veterans.

It shouldn’t favour anyone. It should treat each person as an individual and figure out what they need based on their characteristics. If it’s been designed to only work well for white men it’s been designed poorly.

That’s not sarcasm and your delivery doesn’t even make sense.

You don’t know who he is because he’s not rapping? Is that the joke you were going for?

The who like that is usually used when someone completely unheard of is referred to as if you should know who they are.