There’s no evidence it’s quiltists. That kind of blanket statement has no place in this debate. It could be someone else trying to fleece investors before they cotton on.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3001

If you give yourself a hemorrhoid you’ve got a new friend for life.

Well, there is a market in people who think their city has gone to hell all because of… those people. They’ll eat this shit up.

The happiest thought I’ve seen all day, and it’s already been a real good day.

The best time was 100 years ago. The second-best time is now.

Hey I’ve seen this movie before… https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust

And then squeegee down your forearms and aprons and get back to work.

You just pull the wrist hole open and dump out the excess hand water every hour or so.

Or Judgement

So 0.0001 of global CO2 emissions (2022 global total) Who might be bigger and what should we do about them?

I guess the Talking Heads were on to something. https://youtu.be/PH5JvU19_YQ?si=gqbkXoBWCngdkCpV

It’s because they would charge you for air if they could.

The paper explicitly states that they are calling ChatGPT “bullshit” in the Frankfurtian sense and they cite “On Bullshit” as the source for that definition. It’s right there in the introduction.

You’d know this if you had read the paper or even checked whether your statement were true. So either you read it and then lied deliberately, or you didn’t read the paper nor actually care about the truth value of your own statement, rendering your comment itself bullshit in the Frankfurtian sense.

What a savings.

deleted by creator

So the last time was chloroplasts, right? And that worked out super well for all the other organisms and didn’t do anything catastrophic to the atmosphere, right?

Legend.

Contract number BK-2-ERTH

They clearly needed some good guys with nail guns and toobifores to cage this sumbitch up.