Guildo

don’t update them

Removed by mod

Even in germany nobody likes her, but she is no Nazi bitch - if you say this you don’t know what a Nazi is.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

You are a fan of ww3, right? Shut up!

Playing with american and canadian muscles doesn’t de-escalate, bro.

Removed by mod

his private conversations are all published ;) Lenin said, if you wanna know Marx, you’ve to read his letters, also

yes, vulgar haha - you should read his private conversations.

Because Marx was much more vulgar and he knew and saw the problems. So it’s only logical, that Communists are reading Marx, today.

Also I think it’s important to understand that there are even communists, who don’t read Marx, who hate Lenin etc. There are a lot of beliefs.

To the property… Property is ok for communists. The property of means of production is the problem. This is unacceptable.

At this point I am not sure, if you’re right or wrong or if I understood you wrong, like I said, my english ends at this point, in my native language it would be much easier for me.

I’m ok with this. Thx.

I am sure you didn’t read Marx and if you did, you did not enough.

It’s hard to implement socialism, if it never was tried. You have only one try and if this try fails you have huge problems, cause everything is suddenly gone and than you have slavery, hunger etc. back. And also, if you try to build socialism, suddenly a lot of people are against you. You have to struggle with more problems, than you imagined. And that’s important to understand. You are suddenly enemy with everyone. Look at the russian civil war - they had to fight against several countries, even the USA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Civil_War It’s just crazy. And if you have to fight against several countries than people tend to ignore this and instead they’re saying “See, it doesn’t work.”.

So, yeah, you’re right, communists tend to authoritarianism, but not because they want to. They tend to it, because they have to. There is no choice.

You’re right, liberalism was left-wing a long time, ago. But this liberalism is gone, long time ago. You won’t find it anymore. That has no connection with socialism at all.

If you read Marx, which indead you didn’t, you would say different things. The socialists didn’t try to fight liberalists, they just tried to explain to them why their views are wrong in some parts. This split the whole movement, but not because the socialists were wrong. It split, because the liberalists were naive and believed their own bullshit.

Sorry, my english is very bad, but I also think it is very wrong to split communism and liberalism with the word authoritarianism. Communists want more freedom than liberalists can imagine. Their view is not focused on money and the system. And if they are stricter in their actions, than it’s only because they’ve learned that words are not enough. You have to fight people, who are against the true freedom of all people.

Where’s the difference between neo-liberalism and liberalism? For me there is none. It’s the same, only the historical context is different.

I don’t know who Scott Adams is, but googled it. I am no racist.

It’s just funny, you say sth. against the stupid and inhuman liberalism in the USA and suddenly some idiot comes and says sth. stupid. That’s what I meant - it’s a mental illness.

And yes, the other people here are right. There is no left in the USA and it shows. It’s just right-wing or more right-wing.

Removed by mod

except politicians and managers, they’re overpaid and underqualified