Why not both?

Because this game costs $40 and they want to release a direct competitor to their own product for $20 month.

It’s a learning tool: practically every user will need more than 2 months of play time.

It’s a good thing I have a copy of this already. Yar har.

I mean, I’m no economist, but if China provides food aid to North Korea who then provides weapons to Russia, it may not look so hot for China.

It’s almost like, we as a global entity, need to provide these countries with the resources to protect their environment and still prosper.