There’s more to Palestine than Gaza, so while your 3rd sentence is very much true and more central to the issue at hand, the first one is quite incorrect and might lead people to forget about Abbas/Fatah.

The utility is sufficiently explained by the fact that diligently denying things creates the impression that not denying things means that it’s true.

That is quite possible, but I would assume the visual check to be more lenient than a specified box, especially since they can take into consideration that I wedged it in tightly.

Actually my bag doesn’t fully fit under the seat, just mostly and I live with the reduced foot space. So I might fail a size box for under the seat.

I always place my carry-on under the seat in front, so it would feel absurd to pay for the limited overhead space.

For the FP4 they said one of the reasons they remove the aux input was that more people asked them to reduce the size of their phone than to keep the input.

Hard to be better off than the rich of any era in such relative economic terms without being rich yourself.

There are approaches to delete topics from the trained model, so not sure this will keep them busy for that long.

If the microchip just contains a unique serial ID you can check with the producer, it would be just as easy to print it in the casing or glue it to the side of the wheel, no need to implant it in the outermost layer of cheese.

The police officers committed these acts while they were still in training as part of their dual bachelor’s degree.

Yet this is better than the alternative, it’s easier to get rid of them at the earlier stage.

If companies go pick the most professional applicant by their photo that is a reason for concern, but it has little to do with the image training data of AI.

Hopefully someone or some group didn’t kidnap her to force her to work as a nurse for them.

That does sound like one of the better scenarios to me.

I do think you have a point here, but I don’t agree with the example. If a fan creates the 1001 fan painting after looking at others, that might be quite similar if they miss the artistic quality to express their unique views. And it also competes with their source, yet it’s generally accepted.

The memorization is closer to that of a fanatic fan of the author. It usually knows the beginning of the book and the more well known passages, but not entire longer works.

By now, ChatGPT is trying to refuse to output copyrighted materials know even where it could, and though it can be tricked, they appear to have implemented a hard filter for some more well known passages, which stops generation a few words in.

So what? It’s not the gotcha you apparently believe to have found, companies can have insurance…

If so, who TF is paying the insurance behind the scenes

The owner of the vehicle is probably very openly paying.

If your insurance determined that an autonomous vehicle will cause less damage over time than a human driver, they will do that, yes.

use it to decide who’s resume is going to be viewed and/or who will be hired

Luckily that’s far removed from ChatGPT and entirely indepentent from the question whether copyrighted works may be used to train conversational AI Models or not.

Also what a robot capable of taking over the world would say.

That is a central topic explored in Asimov’s works, dude didn’t just write them down to fix a problem, he wanted to write about them, and other authors did too. They are good rules generally, but hardly foolproof. The “I, Robot” movie is one example of negative outcomes they could lead to.