Because specific treatments work in specific areas.

Sleeping for the brain, general body rejuvenation.

Antioxidants the heart, there are many experiments going on. But health could be attributed to certain treatments.

Sometimes we don’t know the full extent of the affects of treatment over the whole body.

But key aspects can change with certain treatments.

To see if there’s a net positive affect as well.

So without knowing any of the results, they’re invalid? That makes no sense

Or they want to critic it because it’s affecting their bottom line ie fast food industry.

He’s just gone on Netflix. And now he’s receiving a lot of hate.

Or extend their life, because they do consuming junk food and start trying to be healthy. It’s so easy to live a unhealthy life, at least this guy is trying to put people on the right direction.

You guys seem offended that he’s trying to be healthy and it’s weird. I don’t understand your agenda. Unless you work for the fast food companies and don’t like the idea of people but eating junk food.

On a basic level people could just stop eating junk food. Nothing he’s offering is life threatening, however eating harmful food_is_

Well yeah he’s trying many things at once because he wants to extend his life and live the greatest lifestyle. It’s not 100% an experiment. Some of it is just trying to live a longer life through healthy options.

He can read the results for different areas. Ie sleep, how long, when and how that affects his well being.

He’s trying to do a good thing and ask you guys can do is bitterly try and tear it down. I think you guys have an agenda.

If they’re even real. So many bots around these days. And they don’t seem to want to listen so it seems like they have an agenda.

But your advice is cogent, if it’s a real person without an agenda

Weird that you’re attacking someone who’s trying to help people.

Are you being paid by the fast food industry?

To smear and try and debase people who are trying to show people how to be healthier and happier?

So you can keep making money and hurting the population

Longer? And it’s not just him, his son also participates and yes you can change your lifestyle and try results and see if it’s affective for him. That’s still data.

By taking readings and measurements of the human body. Seeing if your in an increased healthy state.

There are markers which shows the health of the body.

Because it seems they’re just trying to smear him. They’re attacking him for no logical reason.

I think that the food industry don’t want you to be healthy and smear campaigns like this are attacking this guy

I’m not and just because I disagree with you doesn’t mean I lack critical thinking skills.

What I said is logical

I don’t know about that but it’s funny you focus only on that.

What about the sleep data, food data, exercise data?

You’re only focusing on a small part of the research. Which makes me think you’re buying have this discussion in good faith

Billionaires normally sell something that the masses want.

If it’s not gained through criminal activities and people actually gave money willingly, then they’re providing a service or product millions of people wanted or used.

Just because people made money doesn’t mean they did it in an egregious fashion automatically

Ha, and now you’re attacking me. So you don’t really have an argument, you’re just slandering people.

It’s pretty telling that many comments on here are just attacking this guy. I wonder if bots are being used to try and smear this guy.

Fast food companies don’t want people to stop eating fast food.

Does getting healthy offend you?

Because he’s trying to do something good. Why are you attacking him so hard?

That’s a generalisation

It’s not an option though. It’s an attack. They’re just attacking his personality, or calling him names. That’s not opinion, that’s just trying to smear the guy.

They’re bad faith arguments.

Calling him a rich ar*ehole isn’t an opinion. It’s just being rude.

He’s helping himself by publishing the results for everyone? That doesn’t even make sense.

You’re being obtuse and and I question your intentions in have a good faith argument.

You’re just trying to be antagonistic now. It’s the data sets. He shows what is beneficial, what’s increasing his longevity. It’s not that hard to comprehend. What decreases issues, what increase years a live on this planet.

Why would you attack someone who’s trying to help find what helps people live longer?